Procedural powers of the prosecutor when receiving, checking and resolving a report on a crime in the Russian Federation and the socialist Republic of Vietnam

The study is devoted to a comparative analysis of the powers of the prosecutor when receiving, checking and resolving a crime report under the current criminal procedure legislation of Russia and Vietnam. Comparative legal research always has the status of relevant, since it allows you to gain new knowledge and solve significant theoretical, legislative and law enforcement tasks at a high degree of efficiency. The purpose of the study is to form a unified methodological approach to determining the procedural position of a prosecutor at the stage of receiving, checking and resolving a crime report, which is objectively justified by modern achievements of criminal procedure science of the Russian Federation and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, especially relevant in the conditions of building an adversarial model of criminal prosecution [13].In the course of the study, the following tasks were solved: 1) to analyze the criminal procedure legislation of Russia and Vietnam regulating the procedural position of the prosecutor when receiving, checking and resolving a crime report; 2) to identify the general patterns of its (the prosecutor's procedural position) modern development, to determine the similarities and differences in the legal regulation of the prosecutor's procedural activity when receiving, checking and resolving crime reports; 3) to use the accumulated experience of criminal court proceedings to optimize the criminal procedure legislation of the two countries in this part.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the study was the general dialectical method of cognition, as well as special legal ones, including comparative legal, formal-logical, system-functional, statistical and others.

Main results: the presence of common patterns in the legal regulation of the prosecutor's procedural activity when receiving, checking and resolving reports on crimes of the two countries is established; the legislator of both states recognizes the special importance of legal and justified resolution of a crime report for the subsequent stages of criminal proceedings; significant differences in the prosecutor's procedural position are identified, the author's vision of the significance of these differences is given, and conclusions are formulated about the possibility of using foreign experience to regulate the procedural prosecutor in the national legislation [15] of each state.

1. Gladysheva O.V., Borozenets N.N. Legal support activities of the prosecutor and criminal prosecution bodies in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings: monograph. Moscow, 2017.

2. Isaenko V.N. Objects of prosecutor's supervision over procedural activity at the initial stage of the investigation // Criminal law. 2010. № 2. Pp. 127-130.

3. Le M.L. Measures to strengthen the responsibility of criminal prosecution in the investigation of a criminal case // Supervision (Hanoi Prosecutor's University). 2020. № 1. Pp. 19-21.

4. Nguyen M.L. A statement and a message about a crime in the criminal procedure law of Vietnam // Law and law. 2019. № 10. Pp. 61-63.

5. Sementsov V.A. The limited nature of coercion in the production of investigative actions in the pre-trial stages of criminal court proceedings // Problems of preliminary investigation and inquiry: collection of scientific tr. № 29: based on the materials of the international scientific and practical conference «Coercion in criminal proceedings: modern problems and trends». Moscow, 2020. Pp. 55-61.

6. Sementsov V.A., Mai D.B. The powers of the prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings under the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Vietnam // Society and Law. 2010. № 3 (30). Pp. 187-191.

7. Sementsov V.A., Stukonog I.V. The powers of the prosecutor to ensure compliance with procedural deadlines in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings: monograph. Moscow, 2021.

8. We should have feedback from people: Prosecutor General Igor Krasnov on how to help citizens by supervising the legality // Kommersant. 2020. September 10.

9. Hong F. The results of the criminal prosecution and supervision of the reception, resolution of reports of a crime by the Prosecutor's Office of Quang Ninh Province // Supervision (Hanoi Prosecutor's University). 2019. № 18. Pp. 17-19.

10. Chan K.F. The implementation of criminal prosecution, supervision of legality in the initiation, investigation and judicial proceedings under the Criminal Procedure Code of 2015 // Supervision (Hanoi Prosecutor's University). 2016. № 16. Pp. 3-5.

11. Shcherba S.P., Chashchina I.V. The key role of the Prosecutor's offices of the Commonwealth countries in coordinating the activities of law enforcement agencies to combat crime // Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. 2021. № 1(81). Pp. 109-117.

12. Andreeva O.I., Matsepuro D.M., Olkhovik N.V., Trubnikova T.V. Criminal justice in the post-genomic era: new challenges and the search for bal-ance // Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Right. 2020. № 35. Pp. 14-28

13. Borodinova T.G., Borodinov V.V. The adversarial system in crimi-nal procedure: Norms and implementation // International Journal of Innova-tive Technology and Exploring Engineering. 2019. № 8 (12). Pp. 4039-4042.

14. Makeeva I.V., Zeynalova L.M., Prudnikov M. N., Aminov I. The in-itial stage of criminal proceedings under the legislation of the Russian federa-tion // International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 2020. Vol. 24. № 6. Pp. 5045-5050.

15. Ryabinina T.K., Ryapolova Y.P. The conformity of a detention pro-cedure of a criminal suspect in the criminal procedure code of the Russian fed-eration to the recognized international standards // World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013. № 28(4). Pp. 481-484

16. Ryapolova Y.P. Participation of an Attorney in the Initial Stage of Criminal Proceedings under Russian Law // The International Journal of Inter-disciplinary Social and Community Studies. 2021. № 16 (1). Pp. 215- 229.