TRUST BETWEEN POLICE AND SOCIETY IN THE CRIME PREVENTION PARADIGM: A EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Interaction between the police and the public is an important factor in the organization and implementation of practices to prevent criminal behavior. The absence of such cooperation gives rise to distrust and fear of the law enforcement system, which ultimately affects the authority of the state power. European states at the beginning of the twentieth century made changes in criminological policy, focusing on building close ties between police officers and residents of a certain territory, which was due to the growing desire of local social groups to participate in the maintenance of public order. This led to a decrease in economic costs and increased the effectiveness of preventive activities in the field of crime and delinquency prevention. Thus, this article is an attempt to analyze the theoretical and practical ideas of using trust relations between the police and representatives of the public in the crime prevention paradigm applied by the EU states.
References
1. Бабаев М.М. Криминологические основы Российской уголовной политики // Современная уголовная политика: поиск оптимальной модели: материалы VII Российского конгресса уголовного права. М., 2012. С. 318-340.
2. Гилинский Я.И. Уголовная политика как элемент государственной политики // Современная уголовная политика: поиск оптимальной модели: материалы VII Российского конгресса уголовного права. М., 2012. С. 353-358.
3. Клейменов М.П. Понятие и модели криминологической политики // Современная уголовная политика: поиск оптимальной модели: материалы VII Российского конгресса уголовного права. М., 2012. С. 371-376.
4. Маслоу А. Мотивация и личность. 3-е изд. / Пер. с англ. СПб., 2013.
5. Ayhan U. Crime Prevention Techniques and Crime Prevention in Turkey // Sarajevo Journal of Social Science. Inquiry. 2016. № 1. P. 161-174.
6. Burton S., McGregor M. Enhancing SARA: a new approach in an increasingly complex world // Crime Science 2018. № 7. [Электронный ресурс]. https://crimesciencejournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40163-018-0078-4
7. Crime and public policy / ed. by J.Q. Wilson, J. Petersilia. 2nd ed. Oxford university press, 2011.
8. Glensor R.W. & Peak K.J Implementing Change: Community Oriented Policing and Problem Solving / Community Oriented Policing and Problem Solving: Now and Beyond. CA Department of Justice. 1999. P. 37-45.
9. Handbook on Policing in Central and Eastern Europe / ed. G. Mesko, C.B. Fields, B. Lobnikar, A. Sotlar. NY., 2013.
10. Hipp J.R. Collective Efficacy: How is it Conceptualized, Does it really matter for Understanding perceived neighborhood crime and Disorder? // Journal of Crime Justice. 2016. Vol. 46. P. 32-44.
11. Mazerolle L., McBroom J., Rombouts S. Compstat in Australia: An analysis of the spatial and temporal impact // Journal of Criminal Justice. 2011. Vol. 39. Issue 2. P. 128-136.
12. Meško G., Flander B., Developments of Social (Crime) Prevention in Europe - a Brief Overview // Kutafin University Law Review. 2016. № 1 (5). P. 46-53.
13. Mitrevska M., Sazdovska M. Application of S.A.R.A. method in the combating of crime. [Электронный ресурс] // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284283927_APPLICATION_OF_SARA_METHOD_IN_COMBATING_CRIME
Review
For citations:
Petrovskiy A.V. TRUST BETWEEN POLICE AND SOCIETY IN THE CRIME PREVENTION PARADIGM: A EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2020;(3):33-38. (In Russ.)
Views:
102
Email this article 