Effectiveness of civil rights protection mechanisms in the reflection of modern judicial practice

Introduction: The paper examines the question of the sufficiency of the existing system of ways to protect civil rights, its practical implementation and effectiveness, taking into account modern judicial practice.

Purpose: To formulate proposals for improving the civil law regulation of the system of ways to protect civil rights in order to expand the possibilities of applying judicial protection of civil rights and interests of participants in civil law relations.

Methods: The research methodology is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition. The author uses general scientific (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, system) and private scientific research methods (formal-legal, comparative-legal, specific sociological research).

Results: The practice of applying Article 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in relation to certificates and declarations of quality of goods sold is analyzed. It is shown that participants in civil turnover require the provision of judicial protection, including by recognizing the issued certificates as not meeting the requirements of the law and other regulatory acts. The strategic task facing the legislator of the country is defined and consists in the need to improve the disposition of Article 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in order to expand the possibility of applying judicial protection of civil rights and interests of participants in civil law relations.

Conclusions: The analysis of numerous examples from judicial practice on the application of Article 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in relation to certificates and declarations of quality of products sold showed the need to clarify the wording of this norm in order to provide a legal opportunity for its use by participants in civil turnover for judicial protection of their rights.

1. Bakman F. Disturbing People. M.: Sinbad. 2020.

2. Gribanov V. PP. Implementation and Protection Civil Rights. M., 2000. Pp. 104–112.

3. Dvigun M.A. Recognition as Invalid of the Act of the State Body or Local Self-government Body in the System of Ways to Protect Civil Rights // Izvestiya Baykalskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 2006. № 6. Pp. 93–94.

4. Deryugina T.V. The concept of subjective civil law in the works of Professor PP.M. Filippova // The rule of law. 2018. № 3. Pp. 20–27.

5. Dickens CH. Posthumous Notes of the Pickwick club. St. Petersburg, 2019.

6. Ioffe S.O., Shargorodsky M.D. Questions of the Theory of Law. M., 1961.

7. Commentary on the Civil code of the Russian Federation // URL: http://www.gk-rf.ru/statia13.

8. Krasheninnikov E.A. The Structure of Subjective Rights and the Right to Quote // The Problems of Subjective Rights Protection and Soviet Civil Proceedings: The Interuniversity Thematic Collection / Ed. P.F. Yeliseykin. Yaroslavl, 1979. Pp. 73–83.

9. Nechaev I.E. The concept and content of ways to protect civil rights // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2016. № 4. Pp. 175-179.

10. Palchikova S.I., Istomin А.S. Invalidation of the act of state body or local self-government as method of protection of civil rights // Moral imperatives in law, education, science and culture: materials of the VI international youth forum. Yelets. 2018. Pp. 183–188.

11. Stoyakin G.J. the Concept of Civil Rights // Problems of Civil Liability and Civil Rights: Collection of Educational Works. Sverdlovsk, 1973. Vol. 27. Pp. 30–35.

12. Bioni B. Dias D. Responsabilidade civil na proteção de dados pessoais: construindo pontes entre a Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais e o Código de Defesa do Consumidor // Civilistica.com. 2016. a 5. n. 2.

13. Manuel J.M.L. Protección del consumidor por la pandemia del COVID-19: el art. 36 del RD-ley 11/2020 // Revista de Derecho Civil. 2020. Vol. VII. № 5. Pp. 1–39.

14. Marques C.L. Barbosa F.N. A proteção dispensada à pessoa idosa pelo direito consumerista é suficiente como uma intervenção reequilibradora? // Civilistica.com. 2020. a 8. n. 2.

15. Venturi T.G.PP. A responsabilidade civil como instrumento de tutela e efetividade dos direitos da pessoa // Civilistica.com. 2020. a 9. n. 3.