The institute of unjustified (unfair) enrichment in theory and judicial arbitration practice
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-3-63-71
Abstract
Purpose: to trace the patterns of development of the institute of unjust enrichment from the point of view of the emerging judicial and arbitration practice and the influence of the principle of good faith on it.
Objectives: to determine the degree of development of the institution of unjust enrichment and a promising direction for the development of its norms; to see the problem of modern judicial practice in cases of unjust enrichment in connection with the application of the rules of limitation to it; highlight the essential idea that is the basis for the existence and application of the rules on unjust enrichment; give a scientific assessment of the works of domestic civil lawyers who are developing the problem of unjust enrichment; turning to foreign civil law science, to see the significance and role that it assigns to the moral foundations of the institute of unjust enrichment, to propose a civil law mechanism for protecting the victim in connection with the receipt of benefits by another person without reciprocal satisfaction, but in the presence of a formal legal basis.
Results: the concept of developing the norms of the institution of unjust enrichment and the practice of their judicial application from the standpoint of the principle of good faith was developed.
Conclusions: it is proved that the institution of unjust enrichment in civil law is one of the most complex, controversial and least developed in civil law theory; the analysis of judicial and arbitration practice showed that the courts are mainly focused on the formal legal application of the norms of the institute of unjust enrichment, and in some cases the court decisions themselves act as the basis for obtaining unjustified benefits by the defendant; it is shown that modern Russian civil law is not so active in developing the problem of the role of moral grounds in regulating relations arising from unjust enrichment; it is argued that the main idea of the institution of unjust enrichment is the idea of justice, which should be taken into account by both the legislator and the courts in law enforcement processes; taking into account the possibility of enrichment of the subjects of civil law relations in the presence of a formal legal basis, the author supports the idea of introducing an additional claim, which will be based on the protection of the moral principle of justice in property relations.
About the Author
L. V. SchennikovaRussian Federation
Larisa V. Schennikova
Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Head Department of Civil Law, Honoured Lawyer of Kuban, Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation
ResearcherID: H-3447-2016
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
References
1. Agarkov M.M. [Obligation under Soviet civil law]. М., 1946. (In Russ.)]
2. Genkin D.M. [Invalidity of transactions made for a purpose contrary to the law]. Uchenye zapiski = Scientific notes. 1947;(V):40–57. (In Russ.)]
3. Gerbutov V.S. [The evolution of enrichment. To the doctrine of enrichment under Russian law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Bulletin of Civil Law. 2012;12(2):36–60. (In Russ.)]
4. Erokhova M.A. [Why is the article of Professor F. F. of Manchester University translated into Russian? Zhilo about "unfair" and "unjustified" enrichment?] Vestnik ehkonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2016;(12):154–189. (In Russ.)]
5. Osakve K. [Obligations resulting from unjustified enrichment in Anglo-American law: fundamental principles and legal policy]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2005;(7):77–95. (In Russ.)]
6. Peregudova D.A. [Institute of Unjustified Enrichment in Russia and Foreign Countries (theoretical and legal analysis)]. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018;(3(46)):72–77. DOI: 10.25724/VAMVD.CRST. (In Russ.)]
7. Peregudova D.A. [Relations arising from unjustified enrichment and their classification]. Legal Concept = Legal Concept. 2019;(4):126–130. (In Russ.)]
8. Ryasentsev V.A. [Obligations from the so-called unjustified enrichment in Soviet civil law]. Uchenye zapiski = Scientific notes. 1949;(144):85–106. (In Russ.)]
9. Fleishits E.A. [Obligations from causing harm and unjustified enrichment]. Moscow, 1951. (In Russ.)]
10. Giglio F.A. Systematic Approach to "Unjust" and "Unjustified" Enrichment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2003;23(3):455–482.
11. Richard J. Long, Andrew Avalon. The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment. Long International. 2023:1–10.
12. Sahib al-Fatlawi, Derar al-Daboubi. Legal Features of the Provisions of Unjust Enrichment in Jordanian Civil Law and Comparative Law. Arab Law Quarterly. 2021;(35):1–14.
13. Swain Warren. Unjust Enrichment and the Role of Legal History in England and Australia. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 2013;36(3):1030–1052.
Review
For citations:
Schennikova L.V. The institute of unjustified (unfair) enrichment in theory and judicial arbitration practice. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2023;(3):63-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-3-63-71