Institute of special knowledge in the field of forensic psychology and forensic psychiatry in criminal proceedings
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-1-127-135
Abstract
The purpose of this scientific work is the analysis of the use of the expertise in the area of judiciary psychology and psychiatry in the criminal proceedings. In order to achieve this objective, the following tasks must be accomplished: to consider differences in expertise, to explore the use the expertise, to identify problems of the assignment of forensic psychological and psychiatric expertise.
A number of methods were used to achieve the objectives. They are logical (description, classification), comparative legal, systematic structural analysis.
The study revealed that in order to make the most efficient use of expertise in the area of judiciary psychology and psychiatry it is necessary to enshrine the notion "expertise" and consolidate advisory and reference activity as procedural form of expertise.
Conclusion. The use of expertise in forensic psychology and psychiatry helps to improve the tactics of separate investigative actions and study individual psychological conditions of participants in criminal proceedings. It will improve the efficiency of criminal cases.
About the Authors
L. A. Ertel
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liudmila A. Ertel, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Criminalistics and Legal Informatics. Author ID: 563806
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (918) 637-52-55
V. A. Strizhev
GBUZ "SKPB № 1" of the Ministry of Health of the Krasnodar Territory
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav A. Strizhev, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Forensic Psychiatric Examination. Author ID: 636197
Krasnaya str., 1, Krasnodar, 350087
O. A. Reshetnyak
Judicial precinct № 39 of the Karasunsky innercity district of Krasnodar
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana A. Reshetnyak, secretary of the court session of the justice
Uralskaya str., 186, Krasnodar, 350088
References
1. Andrianov M.S. [Psychology of participants in criminal proceedings: coping is the victim's strategy]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and law. 2021;2(11):178–192. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2021110213. (In Russ.)]
2. Ivanov A.V. [Features of the production of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examinations in the investigation of sexual crimes]. Vestnik ehkonomiki, prava i sotsiologii = Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2021;(4):76–79. (In Russ.)]
3. Kovalev O.G., Semenova N.V. [To the question of the use of special knowledge of a psychologist in forensic examination]. Stolypinskii vestnik = Stolypin Bulletin. 2021;3(2). (In Russ.)]
4. Lebedev N.Yu., Seitenov K.K. [Some aspects of the classification of forms of the use of special knowledge in the resolution of legal disputes]. Zakon i parvo = Law and law. 2018;(12):139–141. DOI: 10.24411/2073-3313-2018-10288. (In Russ.)]
5. Lebedeva Yu.V. [Conducting an interrogation of a minor witness or victim under the age of 14: specifics, age features, tactical techniques]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020;4(41):45–51. (In Russ.)]
6. Oskolkova S.N. [Diagnosis in general and forensic psychiatry: methodological aspects]. Psikhiatriya = Psychiatry. 2017;(1(73)):23–33. (In Russ.)]
7. Pogodina T.G., Berzin' O.A. [Forensic psychiatric examination and criminalistic study of personality: problems of theory and practice]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020;2(50):111–116. DOI: 10.36511/2078-5356-2020-2-111-116. (In Russ.)]
8. Ponomareva E.S., Delibalt V.V. [Indicators of the pre-suicidal state of minors in the Internet space]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and law. 2021;11(3):47–61. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2021110304. (In Russ.)]
9. Potemkin B.E., Tkachenko A.A. [Factors determining the complexity of clinical diagnosis in the conditions of forensic psychiatric examination]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e = Mental health. 2017;15(12(139)):55–67. (In Russ.)]
10. Safuanov F.S. [How to build a subject type of forensic psychological examination]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law. 2017;7(1):220–239. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2017070118. (In Russ.)]
11. Shishkov S.N., Vandysh-Bubko V.V., Ostyanko Yu.I. [Current problems and current practice of justification of expert opinion in cases of incorrectly formulated expert assignment]. Psikhiatriya, psikhoterapiya i klinicheskaya psikhologiya = Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology. 2020;11(1):11–21. DOI: 10.34883/PI.2020.11.1.001. (In Russ.)]
12. Yarkov A.A. [The concept of "special knowledge": debatable aspects]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021;(8-2(59)):126–128. DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-8-2-126-128. (In Russ.)]
13. Yashin A.V., Martyshkina Yu.V. [Use of knowledge of psychology and psychiatry in the detection and investigation of crimes]. Vestnik Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Penza State University. 2019;(2(26)):19–24. (In Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Ertel L.A., Strizhev V.A., Reshetnyak O.A. Institute of special knowledge in the field of forensic psychology and forensic psychiatry in criminal proceedings. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2023;(1):127-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-1-127-135
Views:
239
Email this article 