Suspicion of domestic criminal proceedings: history and modernity
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-1-101-108
Abstract
The article examines in historical and modern aspects the legal regulation of the institution of suspicion in domestic criminal proceedings, outlining the author's approach to the doctrine of suspicion.
The purpose of this study is to comprehend the procedural formulation of "suspicion", in the absence of its legal concept in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (as opposed to the prosecution). Research objectives: to analyze the history of the formation of the national doctrine of suspicion, to summarize the provisions of the current criminal procedure law regarding the use of the term "suspicion", based on the analysis of various points of view to determine the signs characterizing suspicion, to formulate the author's concept of procedural suspicion.
About the Author
V. A. Sementsov
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Sementsov, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Honored Lawyer of Kuban, Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure. Author ID: 57194869679
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (861) 268-59-64
References
1. Bravilova E.A. [On the accusation and its relationship with criminal prosecution and suspicion: problems of application of modern legislation in practice]. Pravovaya zashchita: problemy primeneniya sovremennogo zakonodatel'stva v praktike. Mezhkafedral'nyi sbornik nauchnykh statei = Legal protection: problems of application of modern legislation in practice. Interdepartmental collection of scientific articles. Yekaterinburg: Publishing house of Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2004;(2):8–16. (In Russ.)]
2. Veligodskii V.V. [Judicial reform and the problems of the institution of suspicion in Russian criminal proceedings]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2008;(1):277–283. (In Russ.)]
3. Velikopol'skaya A.A. [The Institute of suspicion: the concept and meaning in the criminal process of Russia]. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian judge. 2015;(8):23–27. (In Russ.)]
4. Velikopol'skaya A.A. [The suspect and ways to legalize suspicion at the pre-trial stage of the criminal process in Russia]. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian judge. 2016;(1):40–44. (In Russ.)]
5. Davletov A., Voit V. [The institution of suspicion needs improvement]. 1996;(7):23. (In Russ.)]
6. Derishev Yu.V., Zemlyanitsin E.I. [Ontology and axiology of suspicion in criminal proceedings]. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013;3(50):39–42. (In Russ.)]
7. Dikarev I.S. [Suspicion in criminal proceedings]. Zakonnost' = Legality. 2013;8(946):20–22. (In Russ.)]
8. Ivanov D.V. [The Institute of Suspicion in the criminal Proceedings of Russia]. GlagoL" pravosudiya = The verb of justice. 2011;1(2):47–48. (In Russ.)]
9. Kalinkin A.V. [The essence and history of the formation of the institution of suspicion in Russia]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2014;3(98):236–242. (In Russ.)]
10. Kartsev A.V. [On the question of the need to use a material basis for recognizing a person as a suspect]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal proceedings. 2007;(2):14–18. (In Russ.)]
11. Lyakhov Yu.A., Chupilkin Yu.B. [Is it reasonable for the Constitutional Court to expand the concept of a suspect?] Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice. 2008;(12):14–16. (In Russ.)]
12. Maiorova L.V., Ploshkina Ya.M. [Correlation of the concepts of "detention" and "suspicion" in the criminal process of Russia and Germany]. Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Materialy XXIII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 2 chastyakh. Tom 1 = Actual problems of the fight against crime: issues of theory and practice. Materials of the XXIII International Scientific and practical conference: in 2 parts. Volume 1. Красноярск, 2020. (In Russ.)]
13. Potapenko P.G. [Suspicion as a form and stage of criminal prosecution]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii prava = Bulletin of the Saratov State Academy of Law. 2011;6(82):174–177. (In Russ.)]
14. Rudich V.V. [Verification of the validity of suspicion when the court makes a decision on the election of a preventive measure in the context of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of May 24, 2016]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika = Legal science and law enforcement practice. 2016;3(37):45–50. (In Russ.)]
15. Tserkovnyi Yu.V., Michurina O.V., Tutynin I.B. [On the use of the terms "suspicion" and "suspect" in the CPC]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2011;(1):167–169. (In Russ.)]
16. Shelyagina O.A. [The place and significance of suspicion in criminal proceedings]. Molodoi uchenyi = Young scientist. 2017;18(152):257–261. (In Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Sementsov V.A. Suspicion of domestic criminal proceedings: history and modernity. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2023;(1):101-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-15-1-101-108
Views:
150
Email this article 