The concept and composition of a financial offense (financial tort) as a specific methodological basis for the study of financial and legal responsibility: theoretical and legal aspect
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-7-13
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze one of the most significant among the specific methodological foundations of the study of financial and legal responsibility - financial offense (financial tort). In order to achieve this goal it seems necessary to formulate a definition of a financial offense (financial tort); define the problems (both at the theoretical and practical levels) associated with the construction and practical application of its composition in accordance with modern Russian realities.
The goal and objectives of the work defined the methodology of this study, which is based on a number of methods, in particular: general philosophical heuristic, comparative analysis, systematic.
As a result of the study the author formulated his own conclusions, as well as some problematic aspects of theoretical and law enforcement nature. Thus, the definition of a financial offense (financial tort) was presented; the concept of legal composition of a financial offense (financial tort) was defined, the content of each of its elements was disclosed; conclusions on the need to continue scientific research of the institute of "financial and legal responsibility" were made.
About the Author
A. S. Chueva
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arina S. Chueva, Cand. of Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (918) 020-23-47
References
1. Alekseev I.A. [Municipal legal responsibility: problems of theory and practice]. Moscow: Prospect; 2016. (In Russ.)].
2. Bazylev B.T. [Legal responsibility as a protective legal relationship]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet State and Law. 1980;(8):122–125. (In Russ.)].
3. Beisenova A.U. [On the methodology of the study of legal responsibility]. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva i pravovoi informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan = Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2020;1(59):170–176. (In Russ.)].
4. Varul P.A. [Methodological problems of the study of civil liability]. Tallinn, 1986. (In Russ.)].
5. Dvoretskii M.Yu. [Methodology of research on effective implementation of the legal category of "criminal responsibility": problems of domestic theory]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Tambov University. 2015;3(143):154–162. (In Russ.)].
6. Evstigneev Eh.A. [Issues of correlation between guilt and causation in tort law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Bulletin of Civil Law. 2020;(1):33–59. DOI: 10.24031/1992-2043-2020-20-1-33-59. (In Russ.)].
7. Zapol'skii S.V. [Financial law: research methodology, genesis, system]. Moscow: RAP; 2013. (In Russ.)].
8. Kobzar'-Frolova M.N. [Correlation of offense, misdemeanor, crime and tort]. Vestnik rossiiskoi tamozhennoi akademii = Bulletin of the Russian Customs Academy. 2010;(1):50–57. (In Russ.)].
9. Kobzar'-Frolova M.N. [Administrative torts: an impostor or a formed legal phenomenon?] Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie = Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):262–272. DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-262-272. (In Russ.)].
10. Lipinskii D.A. [On the concept and methodology of the study of legal responsibility]. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Science Vector of Togliatti State University. 2009;1(4):76–82. (In Russ.)].
11. Nosova Yu.B. [Disciplinary responsibility of civil servants of the Russian Federation]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Press; 2011. (In Russ.)].
12. Orekhovskii A.I. [Responsibility and its social nature: (Methodological aspect)]. Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University; 1978. (In Russ.)].
13. Popugaev Yu.I. [On Tort, Tortization, and the Improvement of Administrative Tort Rulemaking]. Bulletin of Economic Security = Vestnik ehkonomicheskoi bezopasnosti. 2016;(3):111–118. (In Russ.)].
14. Serkov P.P. [Administrative Responsibility in Russian Law: Current Understanding and New Approaches]. Moscow: Jur. Norma, NIC INFRA-M; 2012. (In Russ.)].
15. Sukiasyan N.G., Sukiasyan G.A. [The concept, features and composition of financial and legal violations.] Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal = Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2016;5(3(16)):274–281. (In Russ.)].
16. Chueva A.S. [On the Understanding and Legal Nature of the Financial-Tort Relationship.] Ocherki noveishei kameralistiki = Essays on Recent Cameralistics. 2022;(1):7–11. (In Russ.)].
17. Borghetti J.-S. The Culture of Tort Law in France. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 2012;(3).
18. Fedtke J. The Culture of German Tort Law. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 2012;(3).
19. Jacquemet-Gauche A. La responsabilite de la puissance publique en France et en Allemagne. Etude de droit compare. Paris, 2013.
20. Oliphant K. Cultures of Tort Law in Europe. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 2012;(3).
21. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference / Ed. by C. von Bar, E. Clive.
Review
For citations:
Chueva A.S. The concept and composition of a financial offense (financial tort) as a specific methodological basis for the study of financial and legal responsibility: theoretical and legal aspect. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(2):7-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-7-13
Views:
987
Email this article 