Preview

Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University

Advanced search

Some problems of legal personality in administrative procedural legal relations

https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-3-56-61

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study a phenomenon that is undergoing evolutionary changes in the theory of administrative process, namely, the subject of administrative procedural legal relations based on the concepts of the general theory of law about the subject of legal relations, taking into account the peculiarities of the sectoral orientation of the norms of administrative procedural and substantive administrative law. Accordingly, the tasks of the work are: determination of the nature of the obligatory and optional subject of the administrative procedural legal relationship; the relationship between the subject of the administrative procedural relationship and the administrative legal relationship

The goals and objectives of the study determined the research methodology, which is based on general philosophical heuristic methods, as well as the method of comparative analysis, system-structural method.

The principal result of this article is the idea that the understanding of the subject of an administrative procedural legal relationship correlates with the concept of the subject of an administrative legal relationship and, accordingly, administrative legal personality is a condition for the presence of an administrative procedural legal personality. However, administrative procedural capacity as an element of legal personality depends not only on age and legal limiting factors, but also on procedural acts of jurisdictional bodies, which, in cases established by law, can endow a person with administrative procedural capacity within the framework of judicial discretion.

At the same time, the synthetic definition of the subject of the administrative procedural relationship entails the heterogeneity of the subject composition of the administrative procedural relationship. In this regard, the logic of the analysis of the declared phenomena presupposes their comparison with similar structural elements of other types of procedural legal relations and a new look at the theory of the subject of procedural legal relations in the general theoretical sense.

About the Author

S. V. Tabelsky

Russian Federation

Tabelsky Sergey Vladimirovich, ProsecutoroftheKrasnodarTerritory



References

1. Buryanova E.I. Conditions that determine the legal personality of an individual (general theoretical aspect): abstract ... Candidate of Law. Volgograd, 2006.

2. Ionova D.Yu. On the issue of administrative procedural capacity // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2016. № 5. Pp. 16-20.

3. Knyazev S., Yashin A. A course of lectures on electoral law and the electoral process of theRussian Federation // URL: http://democracy.ru/library/learning/lectures/page4.html.

4. Kuchinsky V.A. Modern doctrine of legal relations: monograph. Minsk. 2008.

5. Luparev E.B. Administrative and procedural legal personality of foreign citizens and organizations // Journal of administrative proceedings. 2017. № 2. Pp. 16-19.

6. Luparev E.B., Dobrobaba M.B., Mokina T.V. General theory of public relations: monograph. M., 2011.

7. Nechaeva A.M. On the legal capacity and capacity of individuals // State and Law. 2001. № 2. Pp. 34-39.

8. Novikova Yu.S. General theory of legal relations: textbook. Chelyabinsk, 2004.

9. Cuéllar M.-F. Administrative war George Washington. Law Review. № 82 (5). Pp. 1343-1445.

10. De Assumpcąõ L.F.M. Projections for A Non-Judicial Model of Labor Conflicts Resolution in the Post-Brazilian Labor Reform and Post-Extinction of the Ministry of Labour // Revista Opiniao Juridica. 2021. № 19 (31). Pp. 96-126.

11. Perroud T. Government liability in France: A special regime under general principles. Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws. 2021. Pp. 46-49.

12. Rundle K. Administrative discretion and governing relationships: Situating procedural fairness. Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. 2020. Pp. 232-251.

13. Scherzberg A., Seidl J. Administrative litigation in Germany. Administrative Litigation Systems in Greater China and Europe 2016. Pp. 141-162.

14. Strauss P.L., Jerry L. Mashaw and the public law curriculum. Administrative Law from the inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw. 2017. Pp. 87-108.

15. Wollenschläger F., Stapf J. The system of public authority liability in Germany. Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws. 2021. Pp. 50-54.


Review

For citations:


Tabelsky S.V. Some problems of legal personality in administrative procedural legal relations. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(3):56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-3-56-61

Views: 263


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5836 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5841 (Online)