Notarization of a mediation agreement as a way to implement and protect rights
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-3-15-22
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive assessment of legislative innovations on the introduction of notarization of the mediation agreement as a result of mediation services. The authors conclude that it is necessary to introduce new rules for certifying mediation agreements, while identifying the problems of the procedure and rules for notarizing mediation agreements as a way to implement and protect the rights of consumers (parties to the dispute), the legal status of the mediator as a person responsible for conducting mediation services, and the inclusion of agreed terms in the mediation agreement. Elimination of the identified problems and suggestions of ways to overcome them will allow the new institution to develop and become an effective tool in ensuring the implementation of mediation agreements.
About the Authors
L. V. Zarapina
Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zarapina Lidia Vladimirovna, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Civil Law Department
O. V. Kostina
Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kostina Olga Vladimirovna, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Civil Law Department
References
1. Abolonin V.O. Judicial mediation: theory, practice, perspectives. Moscow, 2014.
2. Aleshina T.E. Some issues of mediation in the practice of the Russian notary as a subject of the implementation of the protective function of law // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2016. № 1. (108). Pp. 116–118.
3. Arkhipkina A.S., Babitinskaya A.I. Mediation agreement as a civil law transaction: problems of reality // Siberian legal bulletin. 2011. № 2 (53). Pp. 64–70.
4. Vladimirova M.O. Mediation agreement in the system of civil law regulation: abstract ... Candidate of Law. Kazan, 2014.
5. Gaidaenko Sher N.I. Formation of a system of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms: a conflict-free society as the basis for combating corruption: scientific-practical. allowance / Ed. by Semilyutin N.G. Moscow, 2015.
6. Davydenko D. Giving executive power to mediation agreements: what the new legislation brings to the civil circulation // https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/7/18/pridanie_mediativnym_soglasheniyam_ispolnitelnoj_sily_chto_privnosit_v_grazhdanskij_oborot_v_grazhdanskij_oborot_
7. Treaty as a general legal value: Monograph / Avkhadeev V.R., Astashova V.S., Andrichenko L.V. et al. Moscow, 2018.
8. Zhuikov V.M. The role of the court in the reconciliation of the parties in civil cases // Russian judge. 2019. № 9. Pp. 24-30.
9. Commentary on the Federal Law “On an alternative procedure for resolving disputes with the participation of a mediator (mediation procedure)” (article by article) / Ed. by Zagainova S.K., Yarkov V.V. Moscow, 2012.
10. Commentary on the Federal Law «On an alternative procedure for resolving disputes with the participation of a mediator (mediation procedure)» / Ed. by Zagainova S.K., Yarkova V.V.. Moscow, 2011.
11. Kostina O.V. Mediation - an innovative approach to dispute resolution // Arbitration Court. 2014. No. 1 (91). Pp. 168-172.
12. Kostina O.V., Sinenko V.S., Rastvortseva Yu.A. Mediation as a form of protecting the rights of citizens // Scientific Bulletin of the Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Right. 2015. № 2 (199). Pp. 109-114.
13. Kostina O.V., Shiro D.V. The effectiveness of the participation of a notary as a mediator in the resolution of disputes In the collection: Implementation of constitutional principles in legislation at the present stage // Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2013. Pp. 219–225.
14. Kulapov D.S. Mediation agreement as the final positive-cultural result of the mediation procedure // Legal technique. 2016. № 10. Pp. 601–604.
15. Nikolyukin S.V. Legal technologies of mediation (mediation) in the Russian Federation: scientific and practical guide. Moscow, 2013.
16. Sinenko V.S. Problems of the implementation of the principle of voluntariness in the mediation procedure // Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Right. Issue 30. Pp. 104–108.
17. Shamlikashvili Ts.A. Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure: What a Judge Needs to Know in Order to Competently Offer the Parties to Use Mediation: A Study Guide. M. Interregional Center for Management and Political Consulting. Moscow, 2010.
18. Schwartz M.Z. Reflections on the content and limits of the evidentiary value of the notarial deed (for example, notarized transactions) // Collection of materials and articles for the 10th anniversary of the Center for Notarial Research. Moscow, 2012. Pp. 65-79.
19. Yarkov V.V. Mediation in notarial activity: new opportunities and their limits // Notary. 2020. № 1. Pp.3–6.
Review
For citations:
Zarapina L.V., Kostina O.V. Notarization of a mediation agreement as a way to implement and protect rights. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(3):15-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-3-15-22
Views:
242
Email this article 