Theoretical and methodological problems of building the russian legal system

The relevance of interest in the problems of system analysis and the methodology of systemic knowledge of law is due to the change and expansion of the volume of the right array and the increase in the number of complexly organized objects to be analyzed as independent system objects  as part of systems. Applying a systems approach to the study of such objects and to the analysis of law in general, it allows us to consider legal phenomena as part of systems, which contributes to the understanding of law as a “multifactorial legal reality”, and to study legal matter interlinked with other phenomena similar to law and features of its environment (socio-political, economic , spiritual and cultural) as an integral dynamic phenomenon, taking into account the influence of external factors on it [22, Pp. 94].

As an abstract form of review of law, the system of law serves the holistic perception of law on the basis of determining its elements, their functional properties and establishing links between them[23, Pp. 1- 6]. The purpose of this study is to use a systematic approach, system-structural and system-functional methods of cognition, to determine not only the structural elements of the legal system, their properties and functions as independent legal phenomena, but also their role and significance in a unified system of law and the nature of the links between them.

In the course of the study, the following results were achieved and the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The study of the system of law and its individual elements through the prism of the system provides not only an understanding of the internal properties and connections of law with other structural elements of the system, but also a deeper understanding of the essence of legal phenomena in the system of law as a whole and its system-forming factors.
2. The main direction of modern legal development of the Russian system of law is the specialization of legal norms, the subject and method of legal regulation of which do not coincide, but relate to different types of legal regulation. This inconsistency with the type of legal regulation of individual legal communities of the domestic legal system causes theoretical and methodological problems in the construction of the legal system and in determining the legal regime and structural affiliation of mixed legal communities.
3. The definition of the legal nature of the norms of law, established in legal science, within the strict sectoral division, needs to be rethought and adjusted. In particular, the basis for the systematization of legal norms, the content of which is characterized by a combination of different in nature of legal regulation of the subject and method, should be based not only on the generally recognized legal doctrine classification criteria, but other systemic factors and classification criteria determined by the specifics of relations in various spheres of public life and forms their institutionalization.
4. The legal nature of mixed legal formations of the system of law is due to the interpenetration of private and public law principles in the system of legal regulation and will determine the features of the type and regime of legal regulation of such structural elements of the legal system.

1. Adygezalova G.E. The Legal Concept of 20th Century American Sociological Jurisprudence (Roscoe Pound, Talcott Parsons, and Harry Bredemeyer): Ph.D:thesis ... Candidate of Law. Krasnodar,2004.

2. Adygezalova G.E. Legal concept of the American sociological jurisprudence of the twentieth century (Roscoe Pound, Talcott Parsons and Harry Bredemeyer): abstract ... Candidate of Law. Rostov-on-Don, 2004.

3. Alekseev S.S. Structure of Soviet law. M., 1975.

4. Vengerov A.B. Theory of State and Law: in 2 hours. Part II. Moscow, 1996.

5. Gushchina N.A. The system of law and the system of legislation: correlation and some development prospects // Jurisprudence. 2003. № 5. Pp. 198–204.

6. Dorskaya A.A. The potential of historical and legal science in understanding theoretical and legal categories (on the example of the concept of "system of law") // State and Law. 2015. № 6. Pp.88-92.

7. Kerimov D.A. Philosophical problems of law. Moscow, 1972.

8. Kerimov D.A. Problems of the general theory of law and state: in 3 vol. Vol. 1: Sociology of law. Moscow, 2001.

9. Korneeva S.M. Questions of building a system of law // Jurisprudence. 1963. № 1. Pp. 16-17.

10. Kostyukova A.N. The system of Russian law and municipal law // System of law and its individual branches: state-legal aspect. Omsk, 2002.

11. Maltsev G.V. Social foundations of law. Moscow, 2007.

12. Marchenko M.N. States and law in the context of globalization. Moscow, 2015.

13. Matyukhin A. A. State in the field of law: an institutional approach. Almaty, 2000.

14. Mikhel D.E. Extrajudicial procedures for resolving disputes in the continental legal tradition: history of development and formation of doctrine: thesis ... Candidate of Law. Penza, 2020.

15. Petrov D.E. Branch of law / Ed. M.I. Baytina. Saratov. 2004.

16. Salomatin A.Yu. Increasing the effectiveness of lawmaking in the current stage of legal reform // Izvestiya vysshikh educational institutions. Volga region. Social Sciences. 2009. № 1. Pp. 119–121.

17. Spiridonov L.I. Theory of State and Law. Textbook. Moscow, 2001.

18. Sukhanov E.A. The system of private law // Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser.: Right. 1994. № 4. Pp. 26–33.

19. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Public law: textbook. Moscow, 1995.

20. Chernenko A.K. Theoretical and methodological problems of the formation of the legal system of society. Novosibirsk, 2004.

21. Adygezalova G.E., Faroi T.V., Mikhel D.E., Lukozhev H.M. Judicial debate in criminal proceedings as a way of expressing the interests of the parties to the conflict // Revista inclusiones. 2020. Vol. 7. Pp. 319–327.

22. Fallon R.H. Judicial supremacy, departmentalism, and the rule of law in a populist age//Texas Law Review. 2018. № 96(3). Pp. 487-553.

23. Gaeta G. From a dry branch of the legal system to a current problem: The incompatibility of the cassation judges [Da ramo secco dell'ordinamento a problema attuale: L'incompatibilità dei giudici di cassazione] //Archivio Penale. 2021. (2). Pp. 1-16.

24. Martinuzzi A. Case law order and institutional facts: A comparative analysis upon the normative attitude of intermediate bodies | [Ordine giurisprudenziale e fatti istituzionali: Un'analisi comparata sulla capacità normativa dei corpi intermedi]//Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo. 2020. 22(4). Pp. 869-902.

25. Michel D. Mediation as a way to resolve and prevent international conflicts // International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts. Politicalsciences, law, finance, economicsandtourism. 2014. Vol. 1. Pp. 689-692.