Preview

Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University

Advanced search

Legal regulation of medical technology exports: Russian and world experience

https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-1-87-92

Abstract

The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the experience of public law regulation of the export of medical technologies in the Russian Federation in relation to foreign legislation. The objectives of the study are: the concept of legal regulation of the export of medical technologies in the national export system, as well as the practice of legal regulation of public relations related to the export of medical technologies and their differentiation with medical services and other forms of transfer of medical care. The experience of the COVID-19 coronavirus infection pandemic and other emergency situations of a sanitary and epidemiological nature suggests the possibility of forming the export potential of medical technologies in Russia. The russian legislation on foreign economic activity concerns medical goods, services in the field of public health protection, but does not сoncern technologies in the field of medicine. The export of technologies of this kind comes into contact with various ethical, religious foundations of specific states[1]importers of medical technologies and requires a differentiated approach to the legal regulation of exports. These and other initial problems make it necessary to determine the conceptual framework of the export of medical technologies and the place of this phenomenon in the system of social relations regulated by the norms of law. The goals and objectives of the work determined the research methodology, which is based on comparative legal methods of legal comparative studies. The fundamental result of this work is the idea that the export of medical technologies is limited by the difference in the legislation on the protection of intellectual property in Russia and foreign countries. In this regard, it is necessary to proceed from the priority of the legislation of the country where such technology is exported subject to possible international and national restrictions.

About the Author

Е. В. Luparev
Kuban State University
Russian Federation

Luparev Evgeny Borisovich - Doctor of Law, Professor
Head of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law



References

1. Varyushin M.S. Legal regulation of telemedicine in Russia and the EU: two steps forward and one step back // Law. 2018. № 1. Pp. 166-176.

2. Gaiduk I.E., Novokshenova N.A. The method of treatment as an object of patent law // Journal of the Court of Intellectual Property Rights. 2018. №. 21. Pp. 51- 60.

3. List of innovative projects and patents in the field of medicine / Com. G.V. Pavlova. Izhevsk. 2014.

4. Ponkin I.V., Redkina A.I. Intellectual property law in the sphere of football // IS. Copyright and related rights. 2017. № 5. Pp. 7-14; № 6. Pp. 7-14.

5. Sagieva G. Export and import of technologies // https://issek.hse.ru/news/399520404.html.

6. Shavshina V.P., Golovatsky R.E. Practical aspects of intellectual property protection by customs authorities when moving counterfeit goods across the customs border of the Russian Federation. 2007. № 1. Pp. 131-140.

7. Dolin G. Exclusivity without patents: The new frontier of FDA regulation for genetic materials // Iowa Law Review. 2013. Vol. 98. Issue 4. Pp. 1399-1465.

8. Gong J.X., Zhao L.D. Blockchain application in healthcare service mode based on Health Data Bank // Frontiers of engineering management. 2020. № 4. Pp. 605- 614

9. Gourdin A.S. Le régime juridique du brevet dans l'Union européenne // https://www.lesechos.fr/2004/01/le-regime-juridique-du brevet-dans-lunion-europeenne-1060426.

10. Joshi Pooja, Rao Nilanjana Role of Indigenous People in Conservation of Biodiversity of Medicinal Plants: An Indian Case Study // International Conference on Environment: Survival and Sustainability. Near E Univ, Nicosia, CYPRUS. 2007. Pp. 91-101.

11. Nwabueze Caroline Joelle Challenges of Transnational Trademark Law Practice: The Case of Nigerian Companies' Brands in OAPI States // Revue general du droit. 2015. № 1. Pp. 321-347.

12. Schweiberger K., Hoberman A., Iagnemma J., Schoemer P., Squire J., Taormina J., Wolfson D., Ray K.N. Practice-Level Variation in Telemedicine Use in a Pediatric Primary Care Network During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis and Survey Study // Journal of medical internet research 2020. № 12. Pp. 24345.

13. Sergent D. Brevetage du vivant, une décision européenne rebat les cartes // https://www.la croix.com/Ethique/Bioethique/Brevetage-du-vivant-une decision-europeenne-rebat-les-cartes-2014-12-19- 1256124.

14. Staffieri A., Mostafa B.E., Varghese B.T., Kitcher E.D., Jalisi M., Fagan J.J., Staffieri C., Marioni G. Cost of tracheoesophageal prostheses in developing countries. Facing the problem from an internal perspective // ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA. 2006. № 126/1. Pp. 4-9

15. Yim K.M., Florek A.G., Oh D.H., McKoy K., Armstrong A.W. Teledermatology in the United States: An Update in a Dynamic Era. Telemed J E Health. 2018. № 24 (9). Pp. 691-697.


Review

For citations:


Luparev Е.В. Legal regulation of medical technology exports: Russian and world experience. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(1):87-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-1-87-92

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5836 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5841 (Online)