COMPLETED AND NOT COMPLETED RECEIPT OF BRIBE: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE (TO THE CENTENARY OF THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON CRIMINAL LAW OF THE RSFSR 1919)
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of urgent problems of determining the moment of the end of receiving a bribe. When solving these problems, the author proposes to rely on the norms of the General Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on a completed and not completed crime, while comparing them with similar provisions of the Guiding Principles on Criminal Law of the R.S.F.S.R. With this in mind, a number of clarifications given by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in its resolution of July 9, 2013 No. 24 «On judicial practice in cases of bribery and other corruption crimes» are critically evaluated. The author analyzes in detail the verdicts of the courts in terms of determining when the bribe is finished, many of which, according to the author, contradict Art. 8, 29 and 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In particular, the groundlessness of qualification as a completed crime in cases of transfer of a bribe in the framework of operational-search measures and in the form of money dummies is noted.
Keywords
УК РФ,
взятка,
получение взятки,
оконченное преступление,
покушение на преступление,
судебная практика,
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation,
receipt,
bribe,
completed crime,
attempt,
judicial practice
About the Author
A. V. Ivanchin
P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation
References
1. Коняхин В. П. Теоретические основы построения Общей части российского уголовного права. СПб., 2002. С. 62.
2. См.: Наумов А. В. Преступление и наказание в истории России. В 2 ч. Ч. I. М., 2014. С. 500.
3. Яни П.С. Новые вопросы квалификации взя-точничества // Законность. 2014. № 10. С. 34.
For citations:
Ivanchin A.V.
COMPLETED AND NOT COMPLETED RECEIPT OF BRIBE: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE (TO THE CENTENARY OF THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON CRIMINAL LAW OF THE RSFSR 1919). Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2019;(4):105-111.
(In Russ.)
Views:
264