Criminal procedural course and legal problems: theoretical and applied aspect

Coercion is the most important institution of criminal procedural law, which determines not only the directions of restrictive influence, but also the essence of criminal court proceedings. The direct impact on the rights of its participants is accompanied by many theoretical and applied problems. The purpose of this study is to obtain new knowledge about the essence, forms of coercive influence in the conditions of criminal proceedings and the methods of legal support that properly protect and defend the legitimate interests of subjects of criminal procedural relations. Tasks to be solved: study of modern conditions that contribute to a change in the concept of coercion in criminal proceedings and those measures that have a restrictive effect on the legal status of subjects of criminal procedural relations; understanding the trends in the science of criminal procedure, influencing the modern ideas about the measures of coercion and the means of ensuring rights; formation of the author's position on the essence and types of law-limiting and law-enforcement influence in criminal proceedings; putting forward a scientific hypothesis about correcting the essence of criminal procedural coercion; search for grounds for its confirmation and substantiation of conclusions. The study was carried out on the basis of a set of general scientific and specific scientific methods, including dialectics, various types of analysis, synthesis, generalization, logical, systemic and structural, modeling, etc. The results of this study have become scientific knowledge that complements and, in some part, clarifies the concept of the essence of procedural coercion, measures of coercion, their classification, methods of influencing the legal status of subjects of criminal procedural relations, means of legal enforcement that properly guarantee the protection and protection of legal interests. participants in criminal proceedings. On the basis of the results obtained, separate proposals were formulated on improving the legislation in terms of both the formation of measures of procedural coercion, and the means of ensuring protection from legal restrictions. The author's vision of solving some of the problems arising in the case of legal restrictions applied to legal entities is formulated.

1. Bushnaya N.V. Problems of applying measures of procedural coercion at the stage of preliminary investigation: thesis ... Candidate of Law. Volgograd, 2005.

2. Vasilyeva Z.V., Kutuev E.K. Measures of criminal procedural coercion: concept, goals, types and general characteristics: lecture // Legal science: history and modernity. 2018. № 11. Pp. 113-142.

3. Sparrow S.N. Measures of criminal procedural coercion: essence, purpose, criteria for the validity of application at the stage of preliminary investigation: thesis ... Candidate of Law. Khabarovsk, 2009.

4. Zinatullin Z.Z. Criminal procedural coercion and its effectiveness. Questions of theory and practice. Kazan, 1981.

5. Kovriga Z.F. Criminal procedure coercion: monograph / Scientific. ed. N.E. Lyutikov. Voronezh, 1975.

6. The course of the Soviet criminal process (general part) / Ed. A.D. Boykov and I.D. Karpets. M., 1989.

7. The course of criminal proceedings: textbook. in 3 volumes / Ed. V.A. Mikhailova. M., 2006.Vol. 1.

8. Mikhailov V.A. Preventive measures in the Russian criminal procedure. M., 1996

9. Sementsov V.A. The exceptional nature of the application of a preventive measure - detention // Actual problems of combating crime in the North Caucasian Federal District: mater. XV int. scientific-practical conf. In 2 volumes. Nalchik, 2011.Vol. 1. Pp. 67-75.

10. Strogovich M.S. The course of the Soviet criminal procedure. In 2 vol. M., 1968.Vol. 1. 11. Tkacheva N.V. Implementation of the function of the court in the application of coercion in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series «Law». 2012. № 31. Pp. 75-79.

11. Tutynin I.B. Assumptions about the prospects for the development of procedural enforcement measures of a property nature in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2016. № 4. Pp. 114-116.

12. Ahdout Z.PP. Direct collateral review // Columbia Law Review. 2021. № 121 (1). Pp. 159-214.

13. Owusu-Bempah A. Understanding the barriers to defendant participation in criminal proceedings in England and Wales // Legal Studies. 2020. № 40 (4). Pp. 609-629.

14. Gulchehra T. The importance of the participation of a lawyer with the judiciary and law enforcement in criminal proceedings // European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine. 2020. № 7 (2). Pp. 2169-2173.

15. Khalikova Y., Kazun A. Should I stay, or should I go? self-legitimacy of attorneys in an authoritarian state // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2021. Pp. 1-23.

16. Solodov D., Solodov I. Legal safeguards against involuntary criminal confessions in Poland and Russia // Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal. 2020. № 6 (3). Pp. 1661-1698.