Actual problems of the Institute for the Protection of Honor, Dignity and Business Reputation in the context of the activities of medical organizations
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-16-3-50-63
Abstract
The purpose of the study: The study is aimed at analyzing the institute for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation in the context of the activities of medical organizations. Special attention is paid to the adaptation of existing legal mechanisms to the conditions of the information society and the specifics of the medical field, taking into account its social significance and publicity.
Research objectives:
- Study of the regulatory framework and judicial practice related to the protection of intangible benefits in the medical field.
- Analysis of the specifics of the application of legal mechanisms in the context of medical organizations and their employees.
- Research on the role of forensic expertise and linguistic experts in proving the dissemination of defamatory information on the Internet.
Methods: The study used general scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis, which were used to study the regulatory framework and scientific literature, which made it possible to identify key aspects of protecting honor, dignity and business reputation in the medical field. Induction and deduction contributed to the generalization of data on law enforcement practice and the formulation of conclusions about the specifics of the protection of intangible benefits in medical activities. The comparative legal method was used to compare various legal protection mechanisms both at the national and international levels.
Results: The study revealed that the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation is critically important in the context of information technology development and globalization. In the medical field, reputation plays a key role in the formation of trusting relationships between patients and medical institutions, affecting the quality of medical care and the health of patients. The work also highlights the importance of improving legal protection mechanisms in the context of digitalization.
The author's conclusions:
- The protection of honor, dignity and business reputation in the medical field is important to maintain the stability of civil relations and trust between patients and medical institutions.
- Forensic expertise and linguistic experts play an important role in defamation cases, and their qualifications require improvement.
- Medical ethics and respect for the honor and dignity of the patient should be integrated into the professional activities of doctors.
- It is important to find a balance between the right of patients to freedom of expression and the right of medical organizations to protect their reputation.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. V. PotapenkoRussian Federation
Sergey V. Potapenko, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law named after A.A. Khmyrov
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (918) 262-46-50
Author ID: 57200339768
Researcher ID: AAB-5391-2021
M. S. Magomednabiev
Russian Federation
Murad S. Magomednabiev master's student of the Faculty of Law named after A.A. Khmyrov
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
References
1. Gavrilov E.V. [On the latest practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in cases of protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of those defamed on the Internet]. Perm Law Almanac. An annual scientific journal. 2019;(1):161–162. (In Russ.)]
2. Galyashina E.I. [Special methods of forensic linguistic expertise and expert phantoms (reflections after reading the criminological works of R. S. Belkin) ]. Theory and practice of forensic expertise. 2017;12(3):33–39. (In Russ.)]
3. Issers O.S. [Reviews of medical services and their conflict-causing potential in the era of digitalization]. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistics. 2022;21(3):66–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.3.6. (In Russ.)]
4. Kozyakova E.A. [Protection of honor and dignity of a medical worker: theory and practice]. Actual problems of combating crimes and other offenses. 2023;(23–1):215–216. (In Russ.)]
5. Lorenz D.V. [Information intermediaries (providers) in Russia and foreign countries: nature, essence and typology]. Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2020;(5):136–163. (In Russ.)]
6. Oreshkina M.G. [Liability for defamation under U.S. law (Review)]. State and law. 1998;(4):171–174. (In Russ.)]
7. Potapenko S.V. [Civil protection of honor, dignity and business reputation from defamation in the media]. Irkutsk: Baikal State University of Economics and Law; 2020. (In Russ.)]
8. Potapenko S.V., Danielyan A.S. [Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation: civil and procedural aspects]. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 2021. (In Russ.)]
9. Prokhorenko D.V. [Responsibility of information intermediaries for defamation on the Internet]. Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court. 2020;(27):74–94. (In Russ.)]
10. Selina A.A., Kholodenko Yu.V. [Deleting information on the Internet as a way to protect the honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens]. Legal linguistics. 2017;(6):51–56. (In Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Potapenko S.V., Magomednabiev M.S. Actual problems of the Institute for the Protection of Honor, Dignity and Business Reputation in the context of the activities of medical organizations. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2024;(3):50-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-16-3-50-63