Interpretation and construction of law: difference in concepts and implementation rules in modern India
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-16-2-17-23
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the concepts of interpretation and construction of legal norms in modern India, as well as the rules for their implementation.
To achieve this goal, the author sets himself the objectives of defining and correlating the concepts of interpretation and interpretation of law, as well as characterizing the general rules for their implementation.
To solve these objectives, the author uses comparative legal and logical methods, as well as systemic and structural analysis.
As a result of the research, it is shown that in Indian legal science and law enforcement, the difference between the concepts of «interpretation» and «construction» does exist, and this is connected differentiation mainly with the broad powers of the judiciary to issue judicial precedents.
Conclusion. The concepts of «interpretation» and «construction» of law in India should not be identified with the concepts of clarification and clarification. Interpretation involves theoretical activity aimed at determining the meaning of a rule of law, and interpretation is associated with the process of implementing the law through its adaptation to existing social relations.
About the Author
Yu. V. Taranyuk
FGBOU VO "Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Taranyuk, Cand. of Sci. (Law), Associate Professor Department of Theory and the history of state and law
Kalinina st., 13, Krasnodar, 350044
Tel.: +7 (918) 011-77-08
References
1. Begicheva K.Yu. [The importance of judicial precedent as a source of Indian tax law]. Scientific electronic journal Meridian. 2020;(13):180–182. (In Russ.)]
2. Krayushkin A.B. [The Supreme Court of India and Human Rights: an extended interpretation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution]. Law and Management: XXI century. 2011;(3):68–75. (In Russ.)]
3. Tonkov E.N. [Interpretation of the law in England]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya; 2013. (In Russ.)]
4. Aniket Ojha. Critical analysis of golden rule of interpretation. Jus Corpus Law Journal. 2020;1(1):62–67.
5. Cross R. Statutory interpretation. London: Butterworths; 1995.
6. Khushboo Nagendra Yadav. An Overview on Rules of Interpretation with special reference to Golden Rule. International Journal of Law Management and Humanities. 2021;6(5):878–884. DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.115836/.
7. Ramanasubramanian G & Sneha Muthukumar. Decoding The Significance Of The Mischief Rule In Legal Interpretation. Indian Journal of Law and legal research. 2023;5(6):737–747.
8. Williams C. Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius. Marquette Law Revier. 1931;15(4):191–196.
9. Gayathri M.A. Critical analysis on the literal rule of statutory interpretation. Indian Legal Solution Journal of Criminal and Constitutional Law. 2020;1(1). [сайт]. ILSJCCL; 2020 [обновлено 15 января 2020; процитировано 20 мая 2024]. Доступно: https://journal.indianlegalsolution.com/2020/01/15/a-critical-analysis-on-the-literal-rule-of-statutory-interpretation-m-gayathri/.
Review
For citations:
Taranyuk Yu.V. Interpretation and construction of law: difference in concepts and implementation rules in modern India. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2024;(2):17-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-16-2-17-23
Views:
90
Email this article 