Potestary procedures (forms) of parenting and preventive impact on juvenile: criminological inductive learning of the phenomenon
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-89-96
Abstract
The use of legal and other social norms or practices in crime prevention is a debatable issue. The relevance of the topic is due to the ambiguous position of theorists and practitioners on the admissibility of using potestary forms (measures) of an educational and preventive nature in relation to minors by parents and / or legal representatives. Thus, the purpose of the article is to scientifically analyze the possibility of including coercive potestary methods of crime prevention that exist in the family, community, ethnic group, labor (professional) team in the toolkit for preventing antisocial and / or criminal behavior.
Achieving the goal involves solving the following tasks: substantiation of the effectiveness of a combination of measures of state coercion and potestary coercion (parental, ethnic, confessional) to eliminate and neutralize criminogenic determinants; argumentation of the need to use potestary coercion in anticriminal prevention – an informal social institution for imposing cultural attitudes, value values, evaluative standards, rules of conduct through the prism of collective opinion and seniority.
The goals and objectives of the study contributed to the choice of a methodology presented by a systematic approach that considers the phenomenon of potestary measures in conjunction with preventive legislation, and the use of content analysis made it possible to systematize information about potestary measures (forms) of educational and preventive impact based on a consistent analysis of publications on the subject under study.
As a result, proposals were made to modernize the legislation, expanding the list of forms (measures) of compulsory educational influence in relation to minors, as well as justifying the inclusion in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of the norm Circumstances for the admissibility of behavior that does not pose a public danger.
About the Author
A. V. Petrovskiy
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton V. Petrovskiy, Cand. of Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (928) 409-65-80
References
1. Al'mukhametov R.Sh. "Hazing" among conscripts in modern Russia: factors and contexts. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie nauki = Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Social and Economic Sciences. 2013;13(4):202–213. (In Russ.)
2. Breituehit Dzh. Crime, shame, reunion. Moscow: Center for Judicial Reform; 2002. (In Russ.)
3. B'yukenen Dzh.U. The Frontier of Freedom. Between anarchy and leviathan. Munitsipal'naya ehkonomika = Municipal economy. 2015;(2(62)):2–10. (In Russ.)
4. Gilinskii Ya.I. Crimes against public health and public morality: the view of a criminologist. Kriminalist" = Criminalist. 2021;(2(35)):8–22. (In Russ.)
5. Gozgesheva S.M. The phenomenon of traditional institutions of customary law (adat) and Muslim (sharia) in the North Caucasus. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya = Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Serya 1. Regional studies, philosophy, history, sociology, jurisprudence, political science, cultural studies. 2011;(3):293–300. (In Russ.)
6. Grin'ko N.K., Grun' V.D., Lunev V.G. Cultural traditions and customs of miners. Gornaya promyshlennost' = Mining industry. 2015;(1(119)):98–101. (In Russ.)
7. Dumanov Kh.M., Pershits A.I. Mononoratics and initial law. Article one. Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and law. 2000;(1):108–109. (In Russ.)
8. Erokhin I.Yu. Unification of the Cossack legislation as a trend in the activities of the government and the centralized state apparatus of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th centuries. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve = Gaps in Russian legislation. 2015;(2):47–50. (In Russ.)
9. Karpenkov I.V. Religious Norms and Value Orientations in Modern Legal and Political Relations. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie = National Security and Strategic Planning. 2021;(2(34)):21–29. DOI: 10.37468/2307- 1400-2021-2-21-29. (In Russ.)
10. Kharlamov V.S. Domestic and foreign experience in combating criminal violence in the family. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2014. (In Russ.)
11. Shatkovskaya T.V., Napalkova I.G. Development of the methodology of cognition of the sources of law. Severo-Kavkazskii yuridicheskii vestnik = North Caucasian Legal Bulletin. 2017;(3):9–16. (In Russ.)
12. Shestakov D.A. Family criminology (criminology). St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press; 2003. (In Russ.)
13. Allen S., Murphy K., Bates L. What drives compliance? The effect of deterrence and shame emotions on young drives’ compliance with road laws. Policing and society. 2017;(27(8)):884–898. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2015.1115502.
14. Farrington D.P., Welsh B.C. Family-based prevention of offending: A meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2003;2(36):127–151. DOI: 10.1375/acri.36.2.127.
15. Hoeve M., Dubas J.S., Eichelsheim V.I., van der Laan, Smeenk P.H., Gerris J.R. The relationship between parenting and delinquency: a meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2009;37(6):749–775. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8.
16. Kolvin I., Miller F.J., Fleeting M., Kolvin P.A. Social and parenting factors affecting criminal-offence rates. Findings from the Newcastle Thousand Family Study (1947–1980). The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1988;(152):80–90. DOI: 10.1192 / bjp.152.1.80.
17. Nagin D.S., Paternoster R. Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology. 1994;32(4):581–606. DOI: 10.1111 / j.1745-9125.1994.tb01166.x.
18. Peng Y. When Formal Laws and Informal Norms Collide: Lineage Networks versus Birth Control Policy in China. American Journal of Sociology. 2010;116(3):770–805. DOI: 10.1086/657102.
Review
For citations:
Petrovskiy A.V. Potestary procedures (forms) of parenting and preventive impact on juvenile: criminological inductive learning of the phenomenon. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(4):89-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-89-96
Views:
184
Email this article 