Ensuring the rights of participants in pre-trial proceedings when using the results of operational investigative measures
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-63-73
Abstract
The article substantiates the author's approach according to which the use of the results of operational investigative measures should be understood as the use of these results by the investigator as: 1) the reason and (or) the grounds for initiating a criminal case; 2) the actual basis for the production of investigative actions and the use of coercive measures; 3) the basis for the search and ensuring the personal safety of participants in criminal proceedings and other persons; 4) the basis for the formation of evidence. It is stated that a prerequisite for the use of the results of operational investigative measures in pre-trial proceedings after their submission to the investigator in accordance with the established procedure is the requirement to ensure the rights of the individual through the application of procedures for the statement of proceedings, complaints, participation in procedural actions and familiarization with the materials of the criminal case.
The purpose of this study is to gain new knowledge on ensuring the rights of participants in pre-trial proceedings when using the results of operational investigative measures by the investigator. The results of the study were a set of new provisions that expand scientific ideas on ensuring the rights of participants in pre-trial proceedings when using the results of operational investigative measures. The author's position is substantiated that the procedural means of ensuring the rights of the individual when using the results of operational investigative measures by the investigator are the procedures for filing petitions, complaints, the right to participate in procedural actions and familiarization with the materials of the criminal case formed on the basis of the specified results.
About the Author
U. K. Dzabiev
Investigation Department for the city of Essentuki SU IC of Russia in the Stavropol Territory
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Uruzmag K. Dzabiev, Senior Investigator
Piketnaya str., 3, Predgorny District, Yessentukskaya Station, Stavropol Territory, 357351
Tel.: +7 (928) 928-88-08
References
1. Bastrykin A.I. Counteraction of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation to terrorism and extremism. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Right. 2021;12(4):836–846. DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2021.402. (In Russ.)
2. Belousov A.V. Means of investigative activity of the investigator in the investigation of pickpocketing committed on railway transport. Nauchno-metodicheskii ehlektronnyi zhurnal Kontsept = Scientific and methodological electronic journal Concept. 2014;(26):341–345. (In Russ.)
3. Brusnitsyn L.V. Ensuring the safety of persons assisting criminal justice: world experience and the development of Russian legislation (procedural research). Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2010. (In Russ.)
4. Gladysheva O.V., Sementsov V.A. Improving the activities of law enforcement agencies to combat crime in modern conditions. Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference. Tyumen: Tyumen State Academy of World Economy, Management and Law; 2010. (In Russ.)
5. Gushchin A.N. The use of the results of operational investigative activity at the stage of initiation of a criminal case and in proving criminal cases. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020;(4):157–162. (In Russ.)
6. Dubonosov E.S. Operational search event "Obtaining computer information": content and problems of conducting. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki = Proceedings of the Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. 2017;(2–2):24–30. (In Russ.)
7. Magomedov N.M. Ensuring rights and freedoms when using operational-investigative information in criminal procedural evidence. Zakon i parvo = Law and law. 2022;(1):185–187. DOI: 10.24412/2073-3313-2022-1-185-187. (In Russ.)
8. Ostapovich I.Yu., Nechkin A.V. Implementation and protection of human rights on the Internet: problems of correlation and balance. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg University. Right. 2022;13(2):565–580. DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2022.217. (In Russ.)
9. Rossinskii S.B. The problem of using the results of operational investigative activities in the criminal process requires final resolution. Lex russica. 2018;(10):70–84. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.143.10.070-084. (In Russ.)
10. Sementsov V.A., Rudakova S.V. Modern problems of appeal in domestic criminal proceedings. Yuridicheskii vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(2):33–42. DOI: 10.31426/20785836-13-2-33-42. (In Russ.)
11. Tikhomirova Yu.A., Kichigin N.V., Tsomartova F.V., Bal'khaeva S.B. Law and digital information. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki = Right. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021;(2):4–23. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2021.2.4.23. (In Russ.)
12. Shkhagapsoev Z.L., Khamgokov M.M. The use of the results of operational investigative activities in criminal proceedings. Theory and practice. Zakon i pravo = Law and law. 2018;(7):94–96. DOI: 10.24411/2073-3313-2018-10062. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dzabiev U.K. Ensuring the rights of participants in pre-trial proceedings when using the results of operational investigative measures. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(4):63-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-63-73
Views:
180
Email this article 