Seizure of objects, documents in criminal proceedings and protection of the rights of entrepreneurs
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-52-62
Abstract
The tasks of the economic stability of the state and its economic security are constantly relevant. The search for their solutions takes place in all areas, from the development of concepts and the creation of policy documents for the development of macroeconomics and ending with the implementation of private activities of any economic entity. Of particular importance in this area is the legal basis of entrepreneurship and the protection of business interests.
In criminal proceedings, the problems of ensuring the rights of entrepreneurs are caused by many factors. Among them is the legal uncertainty in the regulation of the involvement and participation of entrepreneurs in investigative and other procedural actions, the procedure of investigative and other procedural actions against entrepreneurs, etc. Such a procedural action as the seizure of objects, documents and other objects related to the activities of entrepreneurs attracts attention. Considering that the procedure of seizure in the criminal procedure Law is provided for in a very peculiar way, and the results of seizure can completely paralyze the work of economic entities, then the definition of the procedure for its conduct in criminal proceedings should be given particularly close attention.
This article suggests the author's approach to solving this problem.
About the Author
O. V. Gladysheva
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Gladysheva, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Honored Lawyer of Kuban, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (861) 268-59-64
Author ID: 57194874777
References
1. Apostolova N.N. Protection of business interests in criminal court proceedings at the stage of initiation of a criminal case. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice. 2016;(2):49–52. (In Russ.)
2. Bondarenko A.A. Seizure of electronic media in the investigation of criminal cases of economic and ordinary criminal orientation, as well as in connected cases. Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika = Legislation and practice. 2019;(1(42)):36–40. (In Russ.)
3. Vasyukov V.F. Seizure of electronic media during investigative actions: novelties of legislation and problems of law enforcement. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Right. 2020;(37):32–39. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/37/3. (In Russ.)
4. Danilov S. Not participation, but victory: we are suing without defeats. Prakticheskaya bukhgalteriya = Practical accounting. 2020;(6): 32–38. (In Russ.)
5. Zaitsev O.A. Procedural guarantees of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs in criminal proceedings. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2021;25(10):108–126. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.127. (In Russ.)
6. Zaitsev O.A., Kashepov V.P., Nudel' S.L. Criminal policy in relation to crimes committed in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right. 2020;(37):40–56. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/37/4. (In Russ.)
7. Zyablina M.V. Novelties of criminal and criminal procedure legislation aimed at protecting the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2018;(1):90–94. (In Russ.)
8. Kazakova V.A., Korableva S.Yu. Article 169 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – imitation of the protection of entrepreneurial activity. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Right. 2020;11(4):919–935. DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2020.406. (In Russ.)
9. Kononov I.C. Protection of the inviolability of the home during the search: recommendations of the ECHR. Ugolovnyi protsess = Criminal proceedings. 2012;5(89):53–55. (In Russ.)
10. Kostenko R.V., Petrova O.A. Problems of seizure of electronic media in the domestic criminal process. Yuridicheskii vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(1):62–71. DOI: 10.31429/20785836-13-1-62-71. (In Russ.)
11. Musaeva U.A. Specifics of conducting an investigative examination in cases of crimes in the field of computer information. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki = Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. 2013;(4–2):295–302. (In Russ.)
12. Sementsov V.A. Legal uncertainty of the regulations on the seizure of documents and items of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (Part 1 of Article 144). Aktual'nye voprosy proizvodstva predvaritel'nogo sledstviya: teoriya i praktika: sb. nauch. tr. vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf = Actual issues of the preliminary investigation: theory and practice: collection of scientific tr. all-Russian scientific-practical conf. M.: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikot; 2019. (In Russ.)
13. Tsepelev K.V., Chernyavskii D.O. Problems of countering obstruction of legitimate entrepreneurial or other activity by criminal legal means. Bezopasnost' biznesa = Business security. 2020;(6):27–31. (In Russ.)
14. Tsokolova O.I., Uleichik V.V., Kuznetsov A.V. Qualification and proof of criminal acts committed in the field of computer information. Informatsionnyi byulleten' Sledstvennogo komiteta MVD Rossii = Newsletter of the Investigative Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 1999;(2). (In Russ.)
15. Churyaev A. Seizure of documents: some features of law enforcement practice. Nalogovyi uchet dlya bukhgaltera = Tax accounting for an accountant. 2011;(9):63–76. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gladysheva O.V. Seizure of objects, documents in criminal proceedings and protection of the rights of entrepreneurs. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(4):52-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-4-52-62
Views:
139
Email this article 