Socialization as a trend in the development of law and its reflection in modern judicial-arbitration practice
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-3-68-76
Abstract
Objective: on the basis of the constitutional and legal theory of the social state, as well as the prevailing social-oriented doctrines in civil law, to substantiate the concept of socialization of law, proving its practicality, that is, realizability in current judicial and arbitration practice.
Tasks: to determine the constitutional foundations of social statehood and the relevance of their further development, to identify areas of civil studies in the field of social orientation of civil law regulation, to substantiate the concept of socialization of law, to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of the concept in judicial arbitration practice.
Methods: general scientific – dialectical, analysis, synthesis, historical, formal-logical, inductive and deductive; specifically scientific in the field of jurisprudence – formal-dogmatic, comparative-legal, historical-legal.
Results: the directions of further development of the constitutional foundations of social statehood are highlighted, the main directions of the social orientation of civil law regulation are determined, the concept of socialization of law as a trend of its development is given, the practical implementation of the highlighted trend in judicial arbitration practice is shown.
Conclusions: under the socialization of law, it is proposed to understand the process of enriching its norms with socially significant content and creating an effective mechanism for its impact on regulated public relations in order to create comfortable conditions for civil life for participants. The practicality of the reasoned theory is proved by concrete examples from judicial and arbitration practice.
About the Author
L. V. Schennikova
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa V. Schennikova, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Honoured Lawyer of Kuban, Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation, Head, Department of Civil Law. ResearcherID: H-3447-2016
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
References
1. Bublik V.A., Semyakin M.N. [The main trends of the modern reform of the civil legislation of the Russian Federation: general characteristics, ontological and epistemological grounds, individual types]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020;(50):705–737. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-50-705-737. (In Russ.)]
2. Gadzhiev G.A. [Economic policy of the state: does the Constitutional Court have an impact on its outlines?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review. 2010;(1(74)):89–96. (In Russ.)]
3. Gadzhiev G.A. [Ethical foundations of the philosophical and legal category "common good" in the context of constitutional economics]. Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review. 2010;(2(75)):58–63. (In Russ.)]
4. Klishas A.A. [The modern concept of the welfare state]. Moscow: Publishing Norma: INFRA-M; 2022. DOI: 10.12737/1859182. (In Russ.)]
5. Klishas A.A. [The welfare state: towards the formulation of the problem]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek = Journal of Law and Administration. XXI century. 2018;(1(46)):32–42. DOI: 10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-32-42. (In Russ.)]
6. Klishas A.A. [The Welfare State]. Moscow: Publishing International Relations; 2017. (In Russ.)]
7. Likhter P.L. [On the model of the constitution of proportionate development]. Lex russica (Russkij zakon) = Lex Russica. 2020;73(5(162)):18–28. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.162.5.018-028. (In Russ.)]
8. Migacheva A.Yu. [The social function of property in Russia and foreign countries]. Yuridicheskij vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2020;(4):24–29. DOI: 10.31429/20785836-12-4-24-29. (In Russ.)]
9. Momotov V.V. [Economic efficiency of law as a goal of legal regulation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2022;26(1):29–35. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.003. (In Russ.)]
10. Solov'ev V.N. [The specifics of the exercise of public property rights in the implementation of the social function of civil law]. Yuridicheskij mir = Juridical World. 2012;(1):27–29. (In Russ.)]
11. Shchennikova L.V. [Agricultural lands: a civilistic view of the social obligation to preserve them]. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review. 2022;6(2):231–240. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).231-240. (In Russ.)]
12. Schennikova L.V. [Social orientation of civil law regulation in the reflection of the norms of Russian inheritance law]. Notarius = Notary. 2020;(2):36–42. DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2020-2-36-42. (In Russ.)]
13. Alikaj V. The Right Of Ownership In The European Law. European Scientific Journal. 2016;12(22):26–37. DOI:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n22p26.
14. Azzena L. Dialogo tra Corti intorno al diritto di proprietà (Dialogue between Courts about the right to property). Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos. 2020;(120):319–339. DOI: 10.9732/p.0034-7191.2020v120p319.
15. Coştiug L.M. Property. Absolut right. Social function. Management Intercultural. 2016;2(36):165–167.
Review
For citations:
Schennikova L.V. Socialization as a trend in the development of law and its reflection in modern judicial-arbitration practice. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(3):68-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-3-68-76
Views:
149
Email this article 