Problems of administrative responsibility for the dissemination of deliberately false information
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-93-98
Abstract
The aim of the work is to highlight the issues of substantive and procedural features of bringing to administrative responsibility for the abuse of freedom of the media.
Accordingly, the tasks of the work include the following research objects: the development of the concept of knowingly unreliable information, respectively, its content in relation to other similar phenomena, the analysis of the practice of applying the relevant articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and the prospects for the development of activities of state bodies in the field of counteracting the spread of knowingly unreliable information.
Due to the fact that the abuse of media freedom is a multidimensional phenomenon related to criminal liability, the author analyzes the ratio of the compositions of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation related to such an aspect of the abuse of media freedom as the dissemination of "fake" information.
The fundamental conclusion of this study is the idea that the compositions of articles 20.3.3 introduced in 2022 in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, if public actions are expressed in the form of dissemination of deliberately false information, are adjacent to the compositions of parts 9.19, 10.1, 10.2 of article 13.15 of the Code of Administrative Offenses RF. The differentiating responsibility element of the objective side is the publicity of the dissemination of deliberately false information, and on the subjective side, the presence of such an optional element of an administrative offense as a goal in the form of discredit.
About the Author
E. B. Luparev
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy B. Luparev, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
Tel.: +7 (861) 262-35-09
Author ID: 57200337167
ResearcherID: AAY-9983-2021
References
1. Brezhnev O.V. [The problem of "anticoid" legal restrictions in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2022;(2):32–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.032-039 (In Russ.)]
2. Dolidze N.I., Ionkina R.S. [Modern technologies of legal education and legal information as a tool for the preventive activities of the prosecutor's office]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian investigator. 2021;(9):54–57. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3783-2021-9-54-57 (In Russ.)]
3. Zharova A.K. [Law and information conflicts in the information and telecommunication sphere]. M.: Janus-K; 2016. (In Russ.)]
4. Maslov I.A. [Ensuring the legality of the use of administrative and jurisdictional means in an unfavorable epidemiological situation]. Zakonnost' = Legitimacy. 2021;(8):22–26. (In Russ.)]
5. Novikov E.A. [Administrative responsibility in connection with the introduction of the high alert regime]. Sud'ya = Judge. 2020;(11):15–20. (In Russ.)]
6. Poshelov P.V. [Features of law enforcement in cases of extremist offenses]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative law and process. 2021;(12):54–57. DOI: 10.18572/2071-1166-2021-12-54-57 (In Russ.)]
7. Rakhmatulina R.Sh. [Deepfake technology in intellectual property law]. Yurist = Lawyer. 2022;(2):52–55. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3929-2022-2-52-55 (In Russ.)]
8. Snezhko O.A. [Ensuring the right to reliable information in the digital space]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2021;(6):38–43. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2021-6-38-43 (In Russ.)]
9. Sovik Yu.I. [Limitation of the dissemination of unreliable socially significant information: the experience of European states]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2020;(8):72–80. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2020-8-72-80 (In Russ.)]
10. Starodubova L.V. [Correlation between the subject of the offense and the victim from the standpoint of the general theory of law]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Legal Studies. 2021;(6):37–43. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2021.6.35823 (In Russ.)]
11. Tikhonov Ya.I. [On preventive legal measures against the spread of COVID-19 in Russia]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie = State power and local self-government. 2021;(2):3–5. DOI: 10.18572/1813-1247-2021-2-3-5 (In Russ.)]
12. Khorunzhii S.N. [Constitutional guarantees for the implementation of electoral rights in the context of responsibility for the dissemination of false information]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law. 2020;(3):55–58. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2020-3-55-58 (In Russ.)]
13. Shestakova M. [Law on "fake news". They will not be fined for any false information]. Ehzh-Yurist = EZh-Lawyer. 2019;(12):3–7. (In Russ.)]
14. Gerbina T.V. Science Disinformation: On the Problem of Fake News. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING. 2021;48(4):290–298.
15. Resende G., Melo P., Benevenuto F. Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures. WEB CONFERENCE 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE. Pp.818–828.
Review
For citations:
Luparev E.B. Problems of administrative responsibility for the dissemination of deliberately false information. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(2):93-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-93-98
Views:
203
Email this article 