Ontology and epistemology of civil turnover
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-21-27
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to reveal the ontological and epistemological properties of civil turnover. To achieve this goal, it seems necessary to identify the ontological meanings of the concept of "civil turnover" as tasks, to give a list of its ontological characteristics, to define and differentiate epistemological approaches to its cognition.
To solve the tasks set in the article, a number of research methods will be used: the method of structural analysis; comparative method; phenomenological approach.
As a result of the study, it was revealed that civil turnover has a dual nature, since it includes two different sides: turnover in the actual meaning, which encompasses all types and forms of real commodity-money exchange on the market; turnover in the normative meaning, which is considered from the point of view of law, that is, as a certain standard or sample.
Conclusion: a cross-cutting ontological and epistemological characteristic of civil turnover is its duality, which is represented in the ontological aspect by the presence of normative and factual dimensions, and in the epistemological aspect by the clash of realistic and constructivist approaches. At the same time, there is a genetic connection, on the one hand, between the actual state of civil turnover and the realistic model of its cognition, and on the other hand, between social constructivism in epistemology and the normative image of civil turnover. Epistemological elements are even included in the ontological nature of civil turnover, since ideas about it determine the nature of its regulatory regulation, which, in turn, directly affects its actual properties.
About the Author
B. B. Inzhieva
FGBOU VO "Kalmyk State University B.B. Gorodovikov"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Buinta B. Inzhieva, Cand. of Sci. (Law), Associate Professor Department of Civil Law and Procedure
Pushkina str., 11, Elista, Republic of Kalmykia, 358000
Tel.: +7 (909) 399-01-10
References
1. Vinichenko Yu.V. [Civil circulation: experience of systemic research]. Irkutsk: BSU Publishing House; 2019. (In Russ.)]
2. Gadzhiev G.A. [Ontology of law: (critical study of the legal concept of reality)]. M.: Norma; INFRA – M; 2013. (In Russ.)]
3. Gutner G.B. [Methodology, ontology and return movement of thought]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2011;(7):166–173. (In Russ.)]
4. Kasavin I.T. [Constructivism as an idea and direction]. In: Lektorsky V.A., ed. Constructivism in the theory of knowledge. Moscow: IFRAN; 2008. (In Russ.)]
5. Krasavchikov O.A. [Soviet civil turnover (the concept and main links)]. Uchenye zapiski SYUI. Voprosy grazhdanskogo, trudovogo prava i grazhdanskogo protsessa = Scientific notes SUI. Issues of civil, labor law and civil process. 1957;(5):3–27. (In Russ.)]
6. Krasikov V.I. [Ontologies]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2013;(9):43–51. (In Russ.)]
7. Kuznetsova N.I. [Empirical and theoretical in epistemology and philosophy of science]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of science and technology. 2021; 26(2);5–9. (In Russ.)]
8. Lektorskii V.A. [Discussion of anti-realism and realism in modern epistemology]. In: Lektorskii V.A., ed. Cognition, understanding, design. Moscow: IFRAN; 2007. (In Russ.)]
9. Lektorskii V.A. [Epistemology classical and nonclassical]. M.: Editorial URSS; 2001. (In Russ.)]
10. Medvedev V.I. [Transcendence of humanitarian knowledge]. Filosofskii zhurnal = Philosophical Journal. 2022;15(1):69–84. (In Russ.)]
11. Porus V.N. [Towards a reform of the system of epistemological goals and values]. Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2021;58(2):34–42. (In Russ.)]
12. Rybalov A.O. [Economic benefits and civil circulation]. In: Rozhkova M.A., red. Objects of civil circulation. M.: Statute; 2007. (In Russ.)]
13. Skurko E.V. [Foundations of modern epistemology of law (theoretical and practical aspects)]. Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad legal journal. 2010;(2):7–21. (In Russ.)]
14. Shabalina E.I. [On the issue of epistemology in jurisprudence and its significance for the implementation of the tasks of law enforcement]. Yurist" – pravoved" = Lawyer – jurist. 2017;(1(80)):7–10. (In Russ.)]
15. Kornblith H. Scientific Epistemology: An Introduction. Oxford University Press; 2021.
16. Zagzebski L.T. Epistemic Values: Collected Papers in Epistemology. Oxford University Press; 2020.
Review
For citations:
Inzhieva B.B. Ontology and epistemology of civil turnover. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(2):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-2-21-27
Views:
171
Email this article 