Problems of the substantive characteristics of administrative procedural legal relations: issues of general procedural and constitutional legal theory

The aim of the work is to study the phenomenon, the meaning of which determines the essence of administrative procedural legal relations, namely, the content of administrative procedural legal relations based on the ideas of the general theory of law on the content of legal relations, taking into account the peculiarities of the sectoral orientation of the norms of administrative procedural and substantive administrative law. Accordingly, the tasks of the work are: determination of the nature of procedural law and procedural obligations in the administrative process, their types and relationships in relation to the characteristics of the participants in the administrative process.

The goals and objectives of the work determined the research methodology, which is based on general philosophical heuristic methods, as well as the method of comparative analysis, system-structural method.

The principal result of this work is the idea that the model of the relationship between the rights and obligations of the parties in the administrative procedural legal relationship can be multivariate. The duty of the subject opposing him in the process does not always correspond to the procedural law of a person. In addition, the absence of a procedural obligation does not deprive a person of his procedural right. The composition and balance of specific procedural rights and obligations in the administrative process depends on the type of proceedings, the nature of participation in the case and the nature of the right and obligation itself. Taking into account the fact that the judicial administrative process is built according to the classical paradigm of jurisdictional proceedings, part of the rights and obligations in the process arise before the court, and not before the opposing procedural subject.

1. Bel'skii K.S. [Phenomenology of administrative law]. Smolensk, 1995. (In Russ.)]

2. Gorelov M.V. [Administrative procedural legal relations in judicial administrative proceedings]. Administrator suda = Court Administrator. 2017;(3)22–24. (In Russ.)]

3. Gorelov M.V. [Administrative process and judicial administrative process]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and civil proceedings. 2017;(6):55–59. (In Russ.)]

4. Durdenevskii V.N. [Subjective law and its main division]. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence. 1994;(3):75–89. (In Russ.)]

5. Zelentsov A.B., Yastrebov O.A. [Judicial administrative law: textbook for university students studying in the specialty "Jurisprudence"]. Moscow: Statute; 2017. (In Russ.)]

6. Lloid D. [The Idea of Law] / Translated from the English by M.A. Yumashev; scientific ed. by Yu.M. Yumashev M.: Knigodel; 2004. (In Russ.)]

7. Luparev E.B. [General theory of administrative and legal dispute]. Voronezh: Publishing House Voronezh. State University; 2003. (In Russ.)]

8. Popov L.L., Migachev YU.I. [Administrative Law of the Russian Federation: textbook] / ed. by L.L. Popov. 2nd ed., reprint. and add. Moscow: RG-Press; 2019. (In Russ.)]

9. Saidov A.KH. [Universally recognized human rights]. Moscow: MZ-Press; 2002. (In Russ.)]

10. Sivitskii V.A. [Challenging normative and nonnormative acts]. Yuridicheskii mir = The legal world. 1999;(1-2):6–19. (In Russ.)]

11. Sorokin V.D. [Administrative procedural law]. L., 1968. (In Russ.)]

12. Starilov Yu.N. [Administrative justice: problems of theory]. Voronezh: Publishing House of Voronezh State University; 1998. (In Russ.)]

13. Khofel'd U.N. [Basic legal concepts in the appendix to judicial argumentation]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie = News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence. 2015;3(320):139–148. (In Russ.)]

14. Sharipova A.R. [Convergence in procedural branches of law: perspectives of judicial law and criminal procedure]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and law. 2021;(7):115–124. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520009986-5 (In Russ.)]

15. Ehbzeev B.S. [The Constitution. Democracy. Human rights]. Moscow – Cherkassk: Pool.; 1992. (In Russ.)]

16. Dezan S.L. and Carmona PAC The processuality broad and disciplinary process, the light of new Civil Procedure Code. A contribution to the administrative procedural theory. A&c-revista de direito administrativo & constitucional. 2017;17(68):93–113.

17. Golob I. The Service of Documents in Administrative Procedural Law – A Comparative Analysis. Сentral European public administration review. 2018;16(2):109–131. DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2018.2.06.

18. Makogon B.V., Nikulin M.I., Samsonov V.N., Sorokoletova M.A., Tovstukha O.O. Objectives and Principles of Administrative Proceedings: Doctrinal Ideas and Legislative Wordings of the Eastern European Countries. Journal of politics and law. 2017;10(4):221–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n4p221.

19. Rundle K. Administrative discretion and governing relationships: Situating procedural fairness. Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives. 2020. Pp. 232–251. DOI: 10.4324/9780429317248-16.

20. Tylchyk V., Tylchyk O. Guarantees of legality of protsess = Arbitration and civil proceedings. 2017;(6):55–59. (In Russ.)]