The subjective right to appeal in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-1-76-85
Abstract
The main purpose of the research is to develop an optimal mechanism of appeal as the most important criminal procedural means of ensuring legality in pre-trial criminal proceedings and protecting the rights and legitimate interests of its participants and other persons involved in the relevant legal relations. Within the framework of this goal, specific tasks were expressed and resolved: the study of international and domestic legal bases for regulating appeals in criminal proceedings, scientific doctrine, views of individual scientists on the problems of the concept, content and mechanism of appeal in pre-trial proceedings, the functioning of this mechanism in terms of the implementation of the principles of appeal, the internal content of this subjective right, ways and means of its implementation, including procedural rules for filing a complaint, appeals to officials and bodies authorized to consider complaints, demanding knowledge of actions (inaction ) and decisions illegal in order to protect the rights and legitimate interests.
Important for the study was the hypothesis about the imperfection of the legislative model of the right to appeal in pre-trial proceedings in general and its individual aspects, the presence of shortcomings of regulatory legal regulation, as evidenced by negative assessments of scientists and practitioners.
About the Author
S. V. Rudakova
FGBOU VO "Kuban State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Rudakova, Cand. of Sci. (Law),Associate Professor,Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure
Stavropol str., 149, Krasnodar, 350040
References
1. Avdeeva E.V. [Respect for the honor and dignity of the individual in criminal proceedings]. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian judge. 2020;(3):31–34. (In Russ.)]
2. Aleksandrov A.I. [Ensuring the Right of the Accused (Suspect) to a Defense in the Criminal Procedure of Russia: Current Problems]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator. 2019;(8):15–18. (In Russ.)]
3. Andreeva O.I., Grigor'ev V.N., Zaitsev O.A., Trubnikova T.V. [Abuse of right, its prevention and suppression in the criminal process of Russia: some results of the study]. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = All-Russian Journal of Criminology. 2018;12(6):914–924. (In Russ.)]
4. Valov S.V. [Subjective rights and legal duties of an investigator]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator. 2020;(4):29–33. (In Russ.)]
5. Golovko L.V. [The domestic concept of "right to judicial protection" and the European concept of "right of access to justice": an attempt of functional comparison]. The right to judicial protection in criminal proceedings: European standards and Russian practice: collection of articles based on materials of the inter-national scientific-practical conference / Ed. by M.K. Sviridov. Tomsk: Published by Tomsk State University; 2007. (In Russ.)]
6. Gordeichik S.A. [Abuse of the right of appeal under Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Advokatskaya praktika = Advocacy practice. 2020;(2):21–22. (In Russ.)]
7. Zheleva O.V. [Abuse of the right to appeal actions (inaction) and decisions of state bodies and officials engaged in criminal prosecution to the court]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2016;(405):168–172. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/405/24 (In Russ.)]
8. Ivanov E.E. [Notification of participants in court proceedings at the pre-trial stages: Strengthen safeguards]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2020;15(4):99–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.099-109 (In Russ.)]
9. Kolokolov N.A. [What is the essence of the abuse of the right of appeal?] Practice of application of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation / ed. by V.M. Lebedev. M.: Yurite; 2016. Т. 1. (In Russ.)]
10. Kachalov V.I. [Criminal and procedural peculiarities of appellate review of judicial decisions made during the execution of a sentence]. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta = Vestnik of Tomsk State University. 2017;(417):195–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/417/28 (In Russ.)]
11. [Criminal Procedure Course] / Ed. by L.V. Golovko. Moscow: Statute; 2021. (In Russ.)]
12. Gladysheva O.V., Potapenko S.V., Sementsov V.A. [Criminal procedural means of ensuring property and personal non-property rights]. Krasnodar: KubGU; 2020. (In Russ.)]
13. Sementsov V.A., Rudakova S.V. [Modern Problems of Appeal in Domestic Criminal Proceedings]. Yuridicheskii vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Legal Bulletin of Kuban State University. 2021;(2):33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31426/20785836-13-2-33-42 (In Russ.)]
14. Strogovich M.S. [Criminal Procedure]. Moscow: Juridical Publishing House of the Ministry of Justice of the USSR; 1946. (In Russ.)]
15. [Criminal-jurisdictional activity in the context of digitalization] / N.A. Golovanova, A.A. Gravina, O.A. Zaitsev et al. Moscow: Kontrakt; 2019. (In Russ.)]
16. Khimicheva O.V., Sharov D.V. [The right to appeal in pre-trial proceedings: freedom and abuse]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2020;(3):53–59. (In Russ.)]
17. Yartsev R.V., Bezrukov O.A. [Abuse of right is the basis for refusal to accept the application]. Mirovoi sud'ya = Justice of the Peace. 2017;(5)23–27. (In Russ.)]
18. Clarke A. Safety or supervision? The unified ground of appeal and its consequences in the law of abuse of process and exclusion of evidence. CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW. 1999. Pp. 108–116.
19. Savage S.P. Thinking Independence: Calling the Police to Account through the Independent Investigation of Police Complaints. The British Journal of Criminology. 2013;53(1):94–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs056.
20. Smith G. Every complaint matters: Human Rights Commissioner's opinion concerning independent and effective determination of complaints against the police. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 2010;38(2):59–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2010.03.001.
21. Uzlau A. Viewpoints on the Admissibility of the Complaint Against Acts and Measures of Criminal Investigation Addressed to the Court. Logos universality mentality education novelty. 2013. Pp. 973–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.786.
Review
For citations:
Rudakova S.V. The subjective right to appeal in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(1):76-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-1-76-85
Views:
202
Email this article 