Should criminal law enforce moral prohibitions?
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-1-40-49
Abstract
Purpose and Objectives: The article explores the relationship between morality and criminal law, formulating and describing models of the influence of morality on the criminalization process.
Methods: The article is based on the requirements of comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity. The main models of the influence of morality on criminal law are described in an overview, based on the classification method. The author also uses comparative legal, empirical and historical methods. The author’s research meets the requirement of interdisciplinarity, as it touches upon philosophical and ethical-legal aspects of the problem.
Results: The authors approved that the moral prohibition is focused on the value-motivational component of the individual’s personality. The criminal law affects the emotional component, producing fear of criminal responsibility.The author concludes that morality does not need criminal law to be sustained, and criminal law does not need to justify morality. There are no clear boundaries between criminal law and morality. Instead, the author suggests that their position should be described in the framework of social norms not by means of Euler circles or drawing borders but by means of layers or "floors". Each of these regulators has its own "problem field". Moreover, morality and criminal law may be overlapped. I’m such case, morality can have a significant impact on the process of criminalization. The author identifies three models of such influence. The first model is inter-normativity. This model describes the natural diffusion of moral and criminal law norms. The second model, legal moralism, describes the enforcement of some moral values by the criminal law. The third model – moral populism – is the appeal to some moral values to promote some solution as universally approved.
About the Authors
I. Ya. KozachenkoRussian Federation
Ivan Ya. Kozachenko, Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of Criminal Law Department
Komsomolskaya str., 21, Yekaterinburg, 620137
ResearcherID: 4843906
D. N. Sergeev
Russian Federation
Danil N. Sergeev, Cand. of Sci. (Law), assistant professor, Criminal Law Department
Komsomolskaya str., 21, Yekaterinburg, 620137
ResearcherID: J-1798-2016
References
1. Apresyan R.G. [The concept of public morality. Afterword to the discussion]. Voprosy filosofii = Problems of Philosophy. 2010;(2):63–75. (In Russ.)]
2. Berardi F. [New heroes: mass murderers and suicides]. Moscow: Kuchkovo field; 2016. (In Russ.)]
3. [Genetic research: legislation and criminal policy] / ed. by I.Y. Kozachenko, D.N. Sergeeva. Yekaterinburg: Sapientia; 2019. (In Russ.)]
4. Iger L. [Ethics as a social science. Moral philosophy of social cooperation]. Moscow: Mysl; 2019. (In Russ.)
5. Kant I. [Metaphysics of Morals. "You must, so you can"] / lane. with him. S.Ya. Sheinman-Topstein, Ts.G. Arzakanyan. Moscow: Rodina; 2019. (In Russ.)]
6. Karbon'e Zh. [Legal Sociology]. Moscow: Progress; 1986. (In Russ.)]
7. Kelsen H. [Pure doctrine of law]. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house "Alef-Press"; 2015. (In Russ.)]
8. Kibal'nik A.G. [On minimizing the possibility of a politically motivated criminal code] // Criminal law impact and its role in crime prevention (IV Saratov criminal law readings): Collection of articles based on the materials of the IV All-Russian scientific and practical conference / Edited by N.A. Lopashenko. Saratov, 2019. (In Russ.)]
9. Kozachenko I.YA., Sergeev D.N. [New criminalization: a philosophical and legal guide to the world of the criminal and non-criminal]. Yekaterinburg: SAPIENTIA; 2020. (In Russ.)]
10. Mal'ko A.V. [Populism as a brake on democracy]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social sciences and modernity. 1994;(1):104–111. (In Russ.)]
11. Smirnov A.M. [Establishment of criminal liability for insulting the religious feelings of believers as an example of the legislator's ignorance of the theory of criminalization of an act]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2019;(4):211–217. (In Russ.)]
12. Solov'ev V. Soch. in 2 volumes. T. 1. 2nd ed. Moscow: Thought; 1990. (In Russ.)]
13. Uotson D. [DNA. History of the genetic revolution]. Saint Petersburg, 2019. (In Russ.)]
14. Fedotova Yu.E. [Insulting the religious feelings of believers and criminal law: work on mistakes]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika = Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2016;(1):199–205. (In Russ.)]
15. Fromm E. [Man for himself]. Moscow: AST: Astrel; 2011. (In Russ.)]
16. Khart G.L. [Law, freedom and morality] / per. from English. S. Moiseeva. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House; 2020. (In Russ.)]
17. Shopengauehr A. [Freedom of will and morality] / trans. and edited by Yu. I. Aikhenveld. M.: Republic, 1992. (In Russ.)]
18. Duff A. The realm of criminal law. Oxford, 2018.
19. Moore M. Placing blame: a general theory of the criminal law. Oxford, 1997.
20. Parsons T. The Social System. New York, 1951.
Review
For citations:
Kozachenko I.Ya., Sergeev D.N. Should criminal law enforce moral prohibitions? Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(1):40-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-1-40-49