Technologies for measuring inmates behavior: russian and foreign experience
https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-2-43-50
Abstract
Based on the analysis of the current state of law and order in the penitentiary system, the article analyzes the available approaches to understanding the manifestations of inmates’ illegal behavior in prison. The importance of traditional methods of operational diagnostics and operational identification in obtaining primary information regarding objects of operational interest is stated. Based on the criterion of the object of criminal encroachment and the degree of importance of relations protected by the norms of criminal law, which may be damaged in the event of an offense in prison, they are analyzed and a classification of objects that need operational-regime control over them is proposed.
The possibilities of the distinctive characteristics of the digital environment, innovative methods of modeling and forecasting, which are the basis for the construction of an abstract model of pre-criminal behavior, are investigated. The importance of criminological knowledge in the technology of operational recognition of destructive behavior is emphasized. The definition of the recognition of unlawful behavior of an unidentified person in places of isolation from society is formulated.
About the Author
M. A. Kaluzhina
Kuban State University; Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kaluzhina Marina Anatolyevna, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate professor, Associate Professor of Criminalistics and Law Informatics Kuban State University; Leading Researcher Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
References
1. Ilyashenko A.N. Features of the use of operational-search information in the criminalistic registration of internal affairs bodies // Society and Law. 2011. №. 2. P. 231-238.
2. Kondratyuk L.V., Ovchinsky V.S. Criminological measurement / ed. K.K. Goryainov. M.: Norma, 2008. 272 p.
3. Ovchinsky S.S. Operational-search information: monograph / ed. A.S. Ovchinsky, V.S. Ovchinsky. P. 189.
4. Ovchinsky A.S., Chebotareva S.O. Crime Matrix. M., 2007.112 p.
5. Rogachevsky L.A. Emotions and crimes. Leningrad, 1984. Р. 4.
6. Rosenthal M.M. Materialistic dialectics. Moscow, 1937.
7. Sakharov A.B. On the personality of the offender and the causes of crime in the USSR. M., 1961. Р. 86-275.
8. Sukhodolov A.P., Kaluzhina M.A., Spasennikov B.A., Kolodin V.S. Digital criminology: a method of digital profiling of the behavior of an unidentified criminal // All-Russian Criminological Journal. 2019. T. 13. № 3. Р. 385–394.
9. Andrew Case, Mohammad M. Jalalzai, Md Firoz-Ul-Amin, Ryan D. Maggio, Aisha Ali-Gombe, Mingxuan Sun, Golden G. Richard III HookTracer: A System for Automated and Accessible API Hooks Analysis, Vol. 29. 2019. Pp. 104–112.
10. Arbach-Lucioni K., Martines-García M., Andrés-Pueyo A. Risk Factors for Violent Behavior in Prison Inmates // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2012. Vol. 39. № 9. Pp. 1219–1239.
11. Brantingham P.J., Faust F.L. A Conceptual Model of Crime Prevention // Crime and Delinquency. 1976. Vol. 22. Issue 3. Pp. 284–296.
12. Douglas J.E., Burgess A., Ressler R., Crime Classification Manual. Jossey-Bass, Publishers, 1992.
13. Rogers M.K. The role of criminal profiling in the computer forensics process // Journal Computer and Security. 2003. Vol. 22. Issue 4. Pp. 292–298.
14. Smith G.J.D., Moses L.B., Chan J. The challenges of doing business in the big data era // British Journal of Criminology. 2017. Vol. 57. Issue 2. Pp. 259- 274.
15. Taylor I., Walton P., Young J. The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance. London: Routledge, 1973. Pp. 140–161.
Review
For citations:
Kaluzhina M.A. Technologies for measuring inmates behavior: russian and foreign experience. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2021;(2):43-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-13-2-43-50
Views:
177
Email this article 